British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001, Vol. 86, No. 6 798-804
© 2001 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
The lumbar epidural space in pregnancy: visualization by ultrasonography
Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany*Corresponding author
Epidural anaesthesia is an important analgesia technique for obstetric delivery. During pregnancy, however, obesity and oedema frequently obscure anatomical landmarks. Using ultrasonography, we investigated the influence of these changes on spinal and epidural anatomy. We examined 53 pregnant women who were to receive epidural block for vaginal delivery or Caesarean section. The first ultrasound imaging was performed immediately before epidural puncture; the follow-up scan was done 9 months later. The ultrasound scan of the spinal column was performed at the L3/4 interspace in transverse and longitudinal planes, using a Sonoace 6000 ultrasonograph (Kretz®, Marl, Germany) equipped with a 5.0-MHz curved array probe. We measured two distances from the skin to the epidural space: the minimum (perpendicular) and the maximum (oblique) needle trajectory. The quality of ultrasonic depiction was analysed by a numerical scoring system. An average weight reduction of 12.5 kg had occurred by the follow-up examination. During pregnancy, the optimum puncture site available on the skin for epidural space cannulation was smaller, the soft-tissue channel between the spinal processes was narrower, and the skin–epidural space distance was greater. The epidural space was narrower and deformed by the tissue changes. The visibility of the ligamentum flavum, of the dura mater and of the epidural space decreased significantly during pregnancy. Nevertheless, ultrasonography offered useful pre-puncture information. Thus far, palpation has been the only available technique to facilitate epidural puncture. Ultrasound imaging enabled us to assess the structures to be perforated. We anticipate that this technique will become valuable clinically.
Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 798–804
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Hwan Kim, K. Hun Lee, K. Bong Yoon, W. Young Park, and D.-M. Yoon Sonographic Estimation of Needle Depth for Cervical Epidural Blocks Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2008; 106(5): 1542 - 1547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. T. Nomura, S. J. Leech, S. Shenbagamurthi, P. R. Sierzenski, R. E. O'Connor, M. Bollinger, M. Humphrey, and J. A. Gukhool A Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound-Assisted Lumbar Puncture J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2007; 26(10): 1341 - 1348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Arzola, M. Balki, and J. C.A. Carvalho The antero-posterior diameter of the lumbar dural sac does not predict sensory levels of spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery: [Le diametre anteroposterieur du sac dural lombaire ne predit pas l'etendue des niveaux sensitifs de la rachianesthesie pour la cesarienne] Can J Anesth, August 1, 2007; 54(8): 620 - 625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. R. Schultz, M. D. Njaa, T. Spahn, D. B. Auyong, A. S. Habib, and M. K. Panni Mid-calf position--an improved technique to place neuraxial anaesthesia. Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2006; 97(4): 583 - 584. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Arzola, J. Carvalho, S. Davies, and A. Rofaeel 26289 - ULTRASOUND TRANSVERSE APPROACH IS RELIABLE FOR LABOR EPIDURALS Can J Anesth, June 1, 2006; 53(suppl_1): 26289 - 26289. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Arzola, S. Davies, A. Rofaeel, and J. Carvalho 26291 - ANTHROPOMETRIC VARIABLES AND LUMBAR DURAL SAC WIDTH USING ULTRASOUND Can J Anesth, June 1, 2006; 53(suppl_1): 26291 - 26291. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H.-J. Rapp, A. Folger, and T. Grau Ultrasound-Guided Epidural Catheter Insertion in Children Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2005; 101(2): 333 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Marhofer, H. Willschke, M. Greher, and S. Kapral New perspectives in regional anesthesia: the use of ultrasound - past, present, and future Can J Anesth, June 1, 2005; 52(suppl_1): R6 - R6. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Marhofer, M. Greher, and S. Kapral Ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2005; 94(1): 7 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Grau The evaluation of ultrasound imaging for neuraxial anesthesia Can J Anesth, June 1, 2003; 50(90001): R7 - 7. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. K. Peterson, F. A. Millar, and D. G. Sheppard Editorial I: Ultrasound-guided nerve blocks Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2002; 88(5): 621 - 624. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|