Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vaughan, D. J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, P. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vaughan, D. J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, P. N.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001, Vol. 86, No. 4 567-569
© 2001 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Choice of opioid for initiation of combined spinal epidural analgesia in labour—fentanyl or diamorphine

D. J. A. Vaughan, N. Ahmad, N. K. Lillywhite, N. Lewis, D. Thomas and P. N. Robinson

Department of Anaesthesia, Northwick Park and St Marks NHS Trust, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex HA1 3AJ, UK*Corresponding author

Sixty-two women requesting regional analgesia in labour were allocated to receive a 1.5 ml intrathecal injection as part of a combined spinal–epidural (CSE) analgesic technique. This contained either bupivacaine 2.5 mg plus fentanyl 25 µg (group F) or bupivacaine 2.5 mg plus diamorphine 250 µg (group D). Times of analgesic onset and offset were recorded, motor and proprioceptive assessments made and side-effects noted. Analgesic onset was not significantly different between the groups (group F, 8.0 min; group D, 9.5 min; P=0.3) but time to first top-up request was significantly longer in the diamorphine group (group F, 73 min; group D, 101 min; P=0.003). Motor loss, assessed by the modified Bromage score, was statistically but not clinically greater in the fentanyl group (P=0.01). Maternal hypotension, pruritis, proprioceptive loss, nausea and fetal bradycardia were rare and not severe, and their incidences did not differ between groups. No respiratory depression was observed after CSE. This use of diamorphine was not associated with increased side-effects compared with fentanyl/bupivacaine, and it has a longer duration of action.

Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 567–9


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
G. A. McLeod, B. Munishankar, and M. O. Columb
Is the clinical efficacy of epidural diamorphine concentration-dependent when used as analgesia for labour?
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2005; 94(2): 229 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.