British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2001, Vol. 86, No. 1 90-93
© 2001 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
Comparison of effects of remifentanil and alfentanil on cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation in hypertensive patients
University Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK*Corresponding author
In a randomized double-blind study, we compared the effect of remifentanil and alfentanil on the cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in patients on long-term treatment for hypertension. Forty ASA IIIII patients were allocated to receive (i) remifentanil 0.5 µg kg1 followed by an infusion of 0.1 µg kg min1 or (ii) alfentanil 10 µg kg1 followed by an infusion of saline; all patients received glycopyrrolate 200 µg before the study drug. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and rocuronium and maintained with 1% isoflurane and 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were performed after establishment of neuromuscular block. Arterial pressure and heart rate (HR) were measured non-invasively at 1 min intervals from 3 min before induction until 5 min after intubation. Systolic (SAP), diastolic and mean arterial pressure decreased significantly after induction in both groups (P<0.05). Maximum increases in mean SAP after laryngoscopy and intubation were 35 and 41 mm Hg in the remifentanil and alfentanil groups, respectively. After intubation, arterial pressure did not increase above baseline values in either group. HR remained stable after induction of anaesthesia, but increased above baseline values after intubation. Mean maximum HR was 87 beats min1 for the remifentanil group (12 beats min1 above baseline; P=0.065) and 89 beats min1 for the alfentanil group (15 beats min1 above baseline; P<0.05). There were no significant differences between groups in HR or arterial pressure at any time. There were no incidences of bradycardia. Seven patients in the remifentanil group and four in the alfentanil group received ephedrine for hypotension (i.e. SAP<100 mm Hg).
Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 903
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-S. Nho, S.-Y. Lee, J.-M. Kang, M.-C. Kim, Y.-K. Choi, O.-Y. Shin, D.-S. Kim, and M.-I. Kwon Effects of maintaining a remifentanil infusion on the recovery profiles during emergence from anaesthesia and tracheal extubation Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2009; 103(6): 817 - 821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Fassoulaki, A. Melemeni, A. Paraskeva, and G. Petropoulos Gabapentin attenuates the pressor response to direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2006; 96(6): 769 - 773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Woods and S. Allam Tracheal intubation without the use of neuromuscular blocking agents Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2005; 94(2): 150 - 158. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Sneyd Recent advances in intravenous anaesthesia Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2004; 93(5): 725 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Cheong, K. S. Kim, and W. J. Choi Ephedrine Reduces the Pain from Propofol Injection Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2002; 95(5): 1293 - 1296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Habib, J. L. Parker, A. M. Maguire, D. J. Rowbotham, and J. P. Thompson Effects of remifentanil and alfentanil on the cardiovascular responses to induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation in the elderly Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2002; 88(3): 430 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

