Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brookes, Z. L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Reilly, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brookes, Z. L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Reilly, C. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2000, Vol. 85, No. 6 901-903
© 2000 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Intravenous anaesthesia and the rat microcirculation: the Dorsal Microcirculatory Chamber{dagger}

Z. L. S. Brookes, N. J. Brown and C. S. Reilly*

Division of Surgical and Anaesthetic Sciences, University of Sheffield, Floor K, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK* Corresponding author

{dagger}This study was presented, in part, at the British Microcirculation Society meeting in April 1999.

The use of the dorsal microcirculatory chamber in male Wistar rats (n=7) to study the effects of induction and maintenance of anaesthesia on the microcirculation is described. Different patterns of responses were observed. At induction, arteriolar dilation was found following propofol and thiopental but ketamine produced constriction. During maintenance, constriction of arterioles was seen with ketamine and thiopental but dilation persisted with propofol. The dorsal microcirculatory chamber appears to be a useful tool for the study of microcirculatory changes related to anaesthesia.

Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 901–3


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Koch, D. De Backer, J. L. Vincent, L. Barvais, D. Hennart, and D. Schmartz
Effects of propofol on human microcirculation
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2008; 101(4): 473 - 478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
Z. L. Brookes, C. S. Reilly, and N. J. Brown
Differential effects of propofol, ketamine, and thiopental anaesthesia on the skeletal muscle microcirculation of normotensive and hypertensive rats in vivo
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2004; 93(2): 249 - 256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
Z. L. S. Brookes, N. J. Brown, and C. S. Reilly
Differential effects of intravenous anaesthetic agents on the response of rat mesenteric microcirculation in vivo after haemorrhage{dagger}
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2002; 88(2): 255 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.