Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ogawa, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suzuki, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ogawa, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2000, Vol. 85, No. 5 732-734
© 2000 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

Duration of exposure to sevoflurane affects dose–response relationship of vecuronium

T. Suzuki1,*, K. Iwasaki2, N. Fukano1, S. Hariya1, S. Saeki1 and S. Ogawa3

1Department of Anaesthesiology, Surugadai Nihon University Hospital, 1-8-13, Kanda-Surugadai, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo, Japan. Departments of 2Hygiene and 3Anaesthesiology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

The purpose of this study was to quantify the relationship between the dose–response curve of vecuronium and duration of exposure to an end-tidal concentration of 1.7% sevoflurane in 67% nitrous oxide and oxygen. Forty adult patients, in groups of 10, were allocated randomly to receive vecuronium by a cumulative dose method at intervals of 15 min (group 15), 30 min (group 30), 60 min (group 60) or 90 min (group 90) after starting inhalation of sevoflurane. Neuromuscular function was monitored by acceleromyographic train-of-four (TOF) responses of the adductor pollicis muscle to ulnar nerve stimulation. Dose–response curves were constructed by least-squares regression analysis and the effective doses of vecuronium (ED50, ED90 and ED95) were estimated and compared between groups. Mean (SEM) ED50, ED90 and ED95 were 16.8 (0.5), 32.6 (1.7) and 40.9 (2.4) µg kg–1, respectively, in group 15; 10.6 (1.0), 20.8 (1.7) and 26.2 (2.2) µg kg–1, respectively, in group 30; 11.2 (1.1), 21.7 (1.6) and 27.3 (1.8) µg kg–1, respectively, in group 60; and 11.0 (1.1), 21.7 (1.6) and 27.5 (1.9) µg kg–1, respectively, in group 90. The values obtained in group 15 were significantly higher than those in the other three groups (P<0.05). The results indicate that the duration of sevoflurane anaesthesia influences the dose–response of vecuronium and 30 min inhalation of 1.7% end-tidal concentration is sufficient to achieve a stable potentiating effect.

Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 732–4

* Corresponding author


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.