British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2000, Vol. 85, No. 2 246-250
© 2000 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
Onset/offset characteristics and intubating conditions of rapacuronium: a comparison with rocuronium
Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX 75235, USA*Corresponding author
We compared onset and offset of action and tracheal intubating conditions after rapacuronium and rocuronium in 60 patients in a randomized, assessor-blinded study. Following induction of anaesthesia with propofol 2.5 mg kg–1, either rapacuronium 1.5 mg kg–1 (n=30) or rocuronium 0.6 mg kg–1 (n=30) was administered to facilitate tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia was maintained with either a propofol infusion (100 µg kg–1 min–1) or sevoflurane (1% end-tidal) with 66% nitrous oxide (N2O), n=15 in each subgroup. Neuromuscular monitoring was performed using an electromyographic (EMG) device (Datex Relaxograph). The lag times (mean 42 (SD 11) s and 44 (16) s), maximum block (99 (2)% and 98 (3)%) and intubating conditions at 60 s (good-to-excellent in 86% and 84% of patients) were similar for rapacuronium and rocuronium, respectively. The onset time of rapacuronium was shorter than rocuronium (87 (20) vs 141 (65) s, P<0.001), and the degree of block at 60 s was greater (69 (26) vs 50 (27)%, P<0.05). Twenty-five per cent recovery was shorter with rapacuronium than rocuronium during propofol (15.0 (3.2) vs 39.1 (14.2) min, P<0.001) and sevoflurane (15.1 (4.2) vs 47.8 (19.0) min, P<0.001) anaesthesia. We conclude that rapacuronium 1.5 mg kg–1 had a more rapid onset, similar intubating conditions, and shorter recovery times than rocuronium 0.6 mg kg–1.
Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 246–50
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. F. Vanacker, E. Geerts, S. Coppens, and M. van Iersel A Comparison of Neuromuscular Effects, Tracheal Intubating Conditions, and Reversibility of Rapacuronium Versus Mivacurium in Female Patients Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2002; 94(4): 876 - 878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. F. White Editorial II: Rapacuronium: why did it fail as a replacement for succinylcholine? Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2002; 88(2): 163 - 165. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. F. Kopman, M. M. Klewicka, and G. G. Neuman Reexamined: The Recommended Endotracheal Intubating Dose for Nondepolarizing Neuromuscular Blockers of Rapid Onset Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2001; 93(4): 954 - 959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. G. Kadar, B. A. Kramer, M. C. Barth, and P. F. White Rapacuronium: An Alternative To Succinylcholine For Electroconvulsive Therapy Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2001; 92(5): 1171 - 1172. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|