Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wong, L. S. S.
Right arrow Articles by McGuire, N. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wong, L. S. S.
Right arrow Articles by McGuire, N. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2000, Vol. 84, No. 6 811-817
© 2000 Oxford University Press


Equipment

Laboratory assessment of the Bird T-Bird VS ventilator performance using a model lung

L. S. S. Wong1 and N. M. McGuire2

1 Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Level 1, JR2, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
2 Tactical Medical Wing, Royal Air Force Lyneham, Chippenham SN15 4PZ, UK

Abstract

We assessed the Bird T-Bird VS ventilator using a model lung constructed to standard 10651–1 of the International Standards Organization. We used different combinations of lung compliance and airway resistance to simulate normal and diseased adult and paediatric lungs. Different preset tidal volumes at various respiratory rates were delivered to the model lung and compared with the actual measured tidal volumes. The results showed that the delivered tidal volumes were within the manufacturer’s specification of ±10% of the preset tidal volumes in normal adult and paediatric combinations of lung compliance and airway resistance. The ventilator can be powered by mains electricity supply or battery and requires only optional compressed oxygen. The ventilator is suitable for the provision of advanced ventilatory support during prolonged patient transfer.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.