British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2000, Vol. 84, No. 6 758-762
© 2000 Oxford University Press
Clinical Investigation |
Do fluid administration and reduction in norepinephrine dose improve global and splanchnic haemodynamics?
1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Bachstrasse 18, D-07740 Jena, Germany
Abstract
We studied global and splanchnic haemodynamics in patients with septic shock, while reducing norepinephrine doses by progressive fluid loading administration. Ten patients (six female, four male, aged 3986 yr, mean 61 yr) were assessed using a transpulmonary thermo-dye dilution technique to measure cardiac output, intrathoracic blood volume and total blood volume. Splanchnic blood flow was measured by the steady state indocyanine green technique using a hepatic venous catheter. Gastric mucosal blood flow was estimated by regional carbon dioxide tension (P
CO2). Hydroxyethylstarch was infused in two stages while maintaining mean arterial pressure, allowing a reduction in norepinephrine dose from 0.54 to 0.33 to 0.21 µg kg1 min1. Mean (
) heart rate significantly decreased, from 104 (13) to 94 (15) beats min1. Total blood volume index (mean (
)) increased from 2650 (638) to 3655 (885) ml m2, intrathoracic blood volume index from 888 (204) to 1050 (248) ml m2 and cardiac index from 3.6 (1.0) to 4.0 (0.9) litres min1 m2. Splanchnic blood flow did not change significantlyeither absolute (from 0.81 to 0.98 litres min1 m2) or fractional (from 22.3% to 23.9%). Gastric mucosal (P
CO2) increased from 7.5 (2.5) to 9.0 (2.8) kPa. The P
2 gap, i.e. the difference between regional and end-tidal P
2, increased from 3.1 (2.5) to 4.0 (2.9) kPa. Marked individual variation in responses suggests that norepinephrine dose reduction by fluid loading in patients with stabilized septic shock does not necessarily increase global or splanchnic blood flow.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. M. Jakob Splanchnic Blood Flow in Low-Flow States Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2003; 96(4): 1129 - 1138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
