Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foëx, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Little, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Foëx, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Little, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2000, Vol. 84, No. 5 660-661
© 2000 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


Abstract

Injury abolishes the spontaneous haemodynamic recovery from simple haemorrhage

B. A. Foëx1, T. Rainey1 and R. A. Little1

1 North Western Injury Research Centre, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK

Abstract

Blunt trauma can be regarded as a combination of haemorrhage and tissue injury. The haemodynamic response to haemorrhage is well known. We wanted to examine the effect of injury on aspects of the haemodynamic and metabolic response to haemorrhage.

Young Large White pigs, anaesthetised with alphaxalone/alphadolone (15 mg kg–1 h–1), were subjected to a haemorrhage of 30% of their total blood volume, with or without a background of brachial nerve afferent nociceptive stimulation (NS) to mimic injury. Shed blood was re-infused after a 30-min shock period. Haemodynamic, gut blood flow (GBF), and plasma lactate measurements were made and oxygen transport variables calculated and analysed using repeated measures ANOVA (Table 3).

Haemorrhage (H) resulted in: (i) a tachycardia, (ii) hypotension, which recovered during the shock phase, (iii) a reduction in gut blood flow, which recovered during the shock phase, but, (iv) no increase in plasma lactate concentration. Nerve stimulation resulted in the expected ‘pressor response’ of tachycardia and increased blood pressure. Trauma, modelled using haemorrhage with nerve stimulation (HNS), differed haemodynamically and metabolically from haemorrhage alone: there was, (i) no recovery of mean arterial pressure (MAP) during the shock phase (P<0.0001), (ii) an immediate increase in systemic vascular resistance (SVR), (iii) a greater reduction in gut blood flow (P=0.012), (iv) gut vasoconstriction (P<0.0001), and (v) increased plasma lactate (P=0.043). Global oxygen consumption was unchanged despite a reduction in oxygen delivery with haemorrhage and nerve stimulation. The oxygen extraction ratio increased in the haemorrhage and the haemorrhage plus nerve stimulation groups, but this did not compensate for the greater metabolic insult provided by haemorrhage plus nerve stimulation compared with haemorrhage alone.

So, the combination of haemorrhage plus injury (mimicked by afferent nociceptive stimulation) results in greater haemodynamic and metabolic disruption than haemorrhage alone. This needs to be considered in the development of better treatments for blunt trauma patients.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.