Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (49)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baillard, C.
Right arrow Articles by Cupa, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baillard, C.
Right arrow Articles by Cupa, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 84, Issue 3 394-395, Copyright © 2000 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Residual curarization in the recovery room after vecuronium

C Baillard, G Gehan, J Reboul-Marty, P Larmignat, CM Samama and M Cupa
Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, Bobigny, France.

We have investigated residual block after anaesthesia which included the use of the neuromuscular blocking agent vecuronium but no anticholinesterase, in 568 consecutive patients on admission to the recovery room. The ulnar nerve was stimulated submaximally using TOF stimulation (30 mA). Postoperative residual curarization was defined as a TOF ratio < 0.7. Of the 568 patients, 239 (42%) had a TOF < 0.7 in the recovery room. These patients had received a larger cumulative dose of vecuronium than patients who had full recovery (mean 7.7 (SD 3.6) mg vs 6.2 (2.7) mg; P < 0.05) and a shorter time had elapsed since the last vecuronium dose (117 (70) min vs 131 (80) min; P < 0.05). Of 435 patients whose trachea was extubated, 145 (33%) exhibited inadequate recovery from neuromuscular block. Six of these had one or no response to TOF stimulation and were reintubated. In the remaining 139 patients, neuromuscular block was successfully antagonized. Only 20 patients (3.5%) remembered TOF stimulation when questioned 2 h later in the recovery room, and discomfort associated with it was assessed using a visual analogue scale before discharge. We conclude that it is necessary to antagonize residual block produced by vecuronium.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. Srivastava and J. M. Hunter
Reversal of neuromuscular block
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2009; 103(1): 115 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. S. Murphy, J. W. Szokol, J. H. Marymont, S. B. Greenberg, M. J. Avram, and J. S. Vender
Research, Not Quality Assurance
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2009; 108(1): 376 - 377.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. S. Murphy, J. W. Szokol, J. H. Marymont, S. B. Greenberg, M. J. Avram, and J. S. Vender
Residual Neuromuscular Blockade and Critical Respiratory Events in the Postanesthesia Care Unit
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2008; 107(1): 130 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. Claudius, H. Karacan, and J. Viby-Mogensen
Prolonged residual paralysis after a single intubating dose of rocuronium
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2007; 99(4): 514 - 517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Naguib, A. F. Kopman, and J. E. Ensor
Neuromuscular monitoring and postoperative residual curarisation: a meta-analysis
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2007; 98(3): 302 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care PainHome page
C. D McGrath and J. M Hunter
Monitoring of neuromuscular block
CEACCP, February 1, 2006; 6(1): 7 - 12.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. Cammu, J. De Witte, J. De Veylder, G. Byttebier, D. Vandeput, L. Foubert, G. Vandenbroucke, and T. Deloof
Postoperative Residual Paralysis in Outpatients Versus Inpatients
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2006; 102(2): 426 - 429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. Baillard, C. Clec'h, J. Catineau, F. Salhi, G. Gehan, M. Cupa, and C. M. Samama
Postoperative residual neuromuscular block: a survey of management
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2005; 95(5): 622 - 626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. S. Murphy, J. W. Szokol, J. H. Marymont, M. Franklin, M. J. Avram, and J. S. Vender
Residual Paralysis at the Time of Tracheal Extubation
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2005; 100(6): 1840 - 1845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. Baillard, S. Bourdiau, P. Le Toumelin, F. Ait Kaci, B. Riou, M. Cupa, and C. M. Samama
Assessing Residual Neuromuscular Blockade Using Acceleromyography Can Be Deceptive in Postoperative Awake Patients
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2004; 98(3): 854 - 7.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. F. Kopman, L. M. Zank, J. Ng, and G. G. Neuman
Antagonism of Cisatracurium and Rocuronium Block at a Tactile Train-of-Four Count of 2: Should Quantitative Assessment of Neuromuscular Function Be Mandatory?
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2004; 98(1): 102 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
R. Appelboam, R. Mulder, J. Saddler, A. F. Kopman, and A. J. McShane
Atracurium associated with postoperative residual curarization
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2003; 90(4): 523 - 524.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. McCaul, E. Tobin, J. F. Boylan, and A. J. McShane
Atracurium is associated with postoperative residual curarization
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2002; 89(5): 766 - 769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.