Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Black, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Black, A. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 84, Issue 2 174-178, Copyright © 2000 by Oxford University Press

ARTICLES

Comparison of the incidence of complications at induction and emergence in infants receiving oral atropine vs no premedication

CA Shaw, AA Kelleher, CP Gill, LJ Murdoch, RH Stables and AE Black
Department of Anaesthesia, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK.

We studied 120 patients less than 1 yr of age, allocated randomly to receive atropine 40 micrograms kg-1 orally 1 h before operation (group A) or no premedication (group B). All patients underwent a standardized anaesthetic, including inhalation induction with halothane followed by atracurium 0.5 mg kg-1, tracheal intubation and positive pressure ventilation. Monitoring during anaesthesia included heart rate, arterial oxygen saturation, temperature and airway conditions at induction and emergence. The incidence of a decrease in arterial oxygen saturation to 94% or less at induction and recovery was similar in both groups (30.5% at induction, 39% at extubation in group A; 31% at induction, 41% at extubation in group B). There were significantly more airway complications in group B both at induction and emergence (25% and 49%, respectively, compared with 9% and 25% in group A; P < 0.015). Mean heart rate at induction and in the peroperative period was significantly higher in the group receiving atropine (P < or = 0.001). There was an increased incidence of bradycardia (decrease in heart rate of > or = 20%) at induction in the non-premedicated group (23% in group B compared with 10% in group A), but this was not statistically significant. We conclude that the incidence of airway complications at induction and emergence was reduced by orally administered atropine premedication.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur Respir JHome page
F. Midulla, J. de Blic, A. Barbato, A. Bush, E Eber, S Kotecha, E Haxby, C Moretti, P Pohunek, and F Ratjen
Flexible endoscopy of paediatric airways
Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2003; 22(4): 698 - 708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
P. Jeffery, S. Holgate, and S. Wenzel
Methods for the Assessment of Endobronchial Biopsies in Clinical Research: Application to Studies of Pathogenesis and the Effects of Treatment
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 15, 2003; 168(6): S1 - 17.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.