Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirota, K.
Right arrow Articles by Matsuki, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hirota, K.
Right arrow Articles by Matsuki, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 83, Issue 2 292-295, Copyright © 1999 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS

Relaxant effect of propofol on the airway in dogs

K. Hirota, T. Sato, Y. Hashimoto, E. Hashiba, T. Kudo, H. Ishihara and A. Matsuki
Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Hirosaki School of Medicine, Hirosaki 036-8562, Japan

Propofol has been suggested to produce airway relaxant effects in vivo, although the mechanism is unclear. We have evaluated the bronchodilating effect of propofol using a direct visualization method with a superfine fibreoptic bronchoscope. We studied 21 mongrel dogs anaesthetized with pentobarbital 30 mg kg-1 i.v. and pancuronium 0.2 mg kg-1 h-1. The animals were allocated randomly to one of three groups (n = 7 in each): propofol group, atropine-propofol group and histamine- propofol group. The trachea was intubated using a tracheal tube that had a second lumen for insertion of the bronchoscope to monitor continuously bronchial cross-sectional area (BCA). BCA was measured using the NIH Image program. In the propofol group, dogs were given the following doses of propofol at 10-min intervals: 0 (saline), 0.2, 2.0 and 20 mg kg-1 i.v. In the atropine-propofol group, saline, atropine 0.2 mg kg-1 and propofol 20 mg kg-1 were given at 10-min intervals. In the histamine-propofol group, bronchoconstriction was elicited with histamine 10 micrograms kg-1 and 500 micrograms kg-1 h-1 until the end of the experiment. Thirty minutes after the start of infusion of histamine, propofol (0, 0.2, 2.0 and 20 mg kg-1) was administered. Changes in BCA were expressed as percentage of basal area. Histamine decreased BCA by 39.2 (SEM 5.4%). Propofol increased significantly basal and histamine-decreased BCA in a dose-dependent manner by 18.4 (4.5%) and 15.8 (4.9%), respectively after 20 mg kg-1 i.v. However, propofol following atropine i.v. did not increase BCA (129.9 (8.2)% after atropine vs 125.7 (8.9)% after propofol). Therefore, the relaxant effect of propofol may be a result of reduction in vagal tone.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
K. Hirota, Y. Hashimoto, and D. G. Lambert
Interaction of Intravenous Anesthetics with Recombinant Human M1-M3 Muscarinic Receptors Expressed in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2002; 95(6): 1607 - 1610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. Nishiyama and K. Hanaoka
Propofol-Induced Bronchoconstriction: Two Case Reports
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2001; 93(3): 645 - 646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
S. Kabara, K. Hirota, E. Hashiba, H. Yoshioka, T. Kudo, T. Sato, and A. Matsuki
Comparison of relaxant effects of propofol on methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in dogs with and without vagotomy
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2001; 86(2): 249 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.