Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hall, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hall, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 82, Issue 6 857-860, Copyright © 1999 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Upper airway reactivity and upper respiratory tract infection: effect of nebulized lidocaine

A. P. Hall, A. J. Fox, J. H. Raphael, N. Nandwani and G. Smith
University Department of Anaesthesia, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK

Patients presenting for elective anaesthesia and surgery may be suffering with, or recovering from, a recent upper respiratory tract infection. Airway reflexes are heightened and these individuals may be more likely to suffer airway complications on administration of general anaesthesia. We have examined the effect of nebulized lidocaine on upper airway reflexes in such subjects. Using dilute ammonia as a chemical stimulus to the upper airway, we measured upper airway reactivity in 15 volunteers (aged 22-43 yr) with symptoms of an upper respiratory tract infection for 4 days or less. The threshold concentration of ammonia producing a brief reduction in inspiratory flow was determined. Measurements were made before and after administration of a nebulized solution of 4% lidocaine 4 ml or saline. After a 2-h interval the procedure was repeated with the alternative solution. The order of administration was randomized. The observer was blind to the solution given. Ammonia threshold was found to increase in subjects after nebulized lidocaine, from a median value of 327 (range 76-878) ppm to 878 (251-1620) ppm (P = 0.0007, Wilcoxon); there was no significant change after nebulized saline. After a convalescence period of at least 4 weeks, with no return of symptoms in the preceding 2 weeks, ammonia threshold was reassessed. It was found to be increased in all 15 subjects. Comparison of the five different times of measurement showed a highly significant difference (P < 0.001, Friedman). Subsequent analysis showed significant differences (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon) between convalescent ammonia threshold and both baseline and post-saline nebulizer values. There was no significant difference between convalescent and post-lidocaine ammonia threshold. We conclude that in adult subjects, nebulized lidocaine attenuated the heightened airway reflex sensitivity associated with symptoms and signs of upper respiratory tract infection.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ChestHome page
B. Prudon, S. S. Birring, D. D. Vara, A. P. Hall, J. P. Thompson, and I. D. Pavord
Cough and Glottic-Stop Reflex Sensitivity in Health and Disease
Chest, February 1, 2005; 127(2): 550 - 557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.