British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 82, Issue 5 764-766, Copyright © 1999 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
K. H. Hoerauf, G. Wiesner, K. F. Schroegendorfer, B. P. Jobst, A. Spacek, M. Harth, S. Sator- Katzenschlager and H. W. Rudiger
Genotoxicity related to waste anaesthetic gas exposure is controversial. We
have investigated the frequency of sister chromatid exchanges in peripheral
lymphocytes of operating room personnel exposed to trace concentrations of
isoflurane and nitrous oxide. Occupational exposure was recorded using a
direct reading instrument. Frequencies of sister chromatid exchanges were
measured in lymphocyte cultures of 27 non-smokers working in the operating
room and 27 non-smoking controls. Personnel were exposed to an 8-h
time-weighted average of nitrous oxide 11.8 ppm and isoflurane 0.5 ppm.
After exposure, sister chromatid exchange frequency was increased
significantly (mean 9.0 (SD 1.3) vs 8.0 (1.4) in exposed and control
personnel, respectively) (P < 0.05). We conclude that exposure to even
trace concentrations of waste anaesthetic gases may cause genetic damage
comparable with smoking 11- 20 cigarettes per day.
SHORT COMMUNICATIONS
Waste anaesthetic gases induce sister chromatid exchanges in lymphocytes of operating room personnel
Department of Anaesthesia and General Intensive Care (B) and Department of Occupational Medicine, University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; Department of Anaesthesia, University of Regensburg, Germany
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E Kadioglu, S Sardas, S Erturk, O Ozatamer, and A. Karakaya Determination of DNA damage by alkaline halo and comet assay in patients under sevoflurane anesthesia Toxicology and Industrial Health, April 1, 2009; 25(3): 205 - 212. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Chandrasekhar, P. V. Rekhadevi, N. Sailaja, M. F. Rahman, J. P. Reddy, M. Mahboob, and P. Grover Evaluation of genetic damage in operating room personnel exposed to anaesthetic gases Mutagenesis, July 1, 2006; 21(4): 249 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Eroglu, F. Celep, and N. Erciyes A comparison of sister chromatid exchanges in lymphocytes of anesthesiologists to nonanesthesiologists in the same hospital. Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2006; 102(5): 1573 - 1577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Kaymak, E. Kadioglu, H. Basar, and S. Sardas Genoprotective role of vitamin E and selenium in rabbits anaesthetized with sevoflurane Human and Experimental Toxicology, August 1, 2004; 23(8): 413 - 419. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Summer, P. Lirk, K. Hoerauf, U. Riccabona, F. Bodrogi, H. Raifer, M. Deibl, J. Rieder, and W. Schobersberger Sevoflurane in Exhaled Air of Operating Room Personnel Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2003; 97(4): 1070 - 1073. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Krause, J. Scholz, L. Jansen, H. Boettcher, C. Koch, F. Wappler, and J. Schulte am Esch Sevoflurane anaesthesia does not induce the formation of sister chromatid exchanges in peripheral blood lymphocytes of children Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2003; 90(2): 233 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Gustorff, N. Lorenzl, L. Aram, C. G. Krenn, B. P. Jobst, and K. H. Hoerauf Environmental Monitoring of Sevoflurane and Nitrous Oxide Using the Cuffed Oropharyngeal Airway Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2002; 94(5): 1244 - 1248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. H. Hoerauf, T. Hartmann, S. Acimovic, A. Kopp, G. Wiesner, B. Gustorff, H. Jellinek, and P. Krafft Waste gas exposure to sevoflurane and nitrous oxide during anaesthesia using the oesophageal-tracheal Combitube small adultTM Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2001; 86(1): 124 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Wiesner, K. Hoerauf, K. Schroegendorfer, P. Sobczynski, M. Harth, and H. W. Ruediger High-Level, but Not Low-Level, Occupational Exposure to Inhaled Anesthetics Is Associated with Genotoxicity in the Micronucleus Assay Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2001; 92(1): 118 - 122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




