British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 82, Issue 5 755-756, Copyright © 1999 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
K. C. McCourt, R. K. Mirakhur, D. W. Lowry, M. T. Carroll and H. J. Sparr
We have examined spontaneous and neostigmine-induced recovery after an
initial dose of Org 9487 1.5 mg kg-1 followed by three repeat doses of Org
9487, a 30-min infusion of Org 9487 or two incremental doses of rocuronium.
Mean clinical duration after incremental doses of Org 9487 0.5 mg kg-1
increased from 12.3 (SD 3.4) min to 14.0 (4.0) and 15.9 (5.9) min (P <
0.01), and after rocuronium from 14.4 (5.2) min to 19.2 (5.9) min (P <
0.01). Times for spontaneous recovery from a T1 of 25% to a TOF ratio of
0.8 after the last bolus dose of Org 9487 and after a 30-min infusion were
72.4 (16.5) and 66.1 (26.9) min compared with 36.7 (15.8) min in the group
receiving reocuronium. These times were significantly reduced to 9.9 (4.5),
8.6 (6.1) and 5.7 (2.5) min, respectively, after neostigmine administration
at a T1 of 25% (P < 0.05). We conclude that administration of Org 9487
by repeat bolus doses or infusion was associated with slow spontaneous
recovery but neostigmine administration resulted in adequate recovery in
less than 10 min.
SHORT COMMUNICATIONS
Spontaneous or neostigmine-induced recovery after maintenance of neuromuscular block with Org 9487 (rapacuronium) or rocuronium following an initial dose of Org 9487
Department of Anaesthetics, The Queen's University of Belfast, Whitla Medical Building, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK; Department of Anaesthesia, Leopold-Franzens-Universitat, Innsbruck, Austria
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. F. White Editorial II: Rapacuronium: why did it fail as a replacement for succinylcholine? Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2002; 88(2): 163 - 165. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. W. Moore and J. M. Hunter The new neuromuscular blocking agents: do they offer any advantages? Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2001; 87(6): 912 - 925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
