Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (49)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gajraj, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kenny, GNC.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gajraj, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kenny, GNC.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 82, Issue 5 672-678, Copyright © 1999 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Comparison of bispectral EEG analysis and auditory evoked potentials for monitoring depth of anaesthesia during propofol anaesthesia

R. J. Gajraj, M. Doi, H. Mantzaridis and GNC. Kenny
Department of Anaesthesia, General Infirmary at Leeds, Great George Street, Leeds LSI 3EX, UK; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 3600 Handa, Hamamatsu 431-31, Japan; Department of Anaesthetics, Law Hospital, Carluke, Lanarkshire ML8 5ER, UK; Glasgow University Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Infirmary, 8-16 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK

We have compared the auditory evoked potential index (AEPIndex) and bispectral index (BIS) for monitoring depth of anaesthesia in spontaneously breathing surgical patients. Twenty patients (aged 17-49 yr) undergoing day surgery were anaesthetized with computer-controlled infusions of propofol. The mean (SD and range) of each measurement was determined during consciousness and unconsciousness and at specific times during the perioperative period. Mean values for AEPIndex during consciousness and unconsciousness were 74.5 (SD 14.7) 36.7 (7.1), respectively. BIS had mean values of 89.5 (SD 4.6) during consciousness and 48.8 (16.4) during unconsciousness. AEPIndex and BIS were greater during consciousness compared with during unconsciousness. The average awake values of AEPIndex were significantly higher than all average values during unconsciousness but this was not the case for BIS. BIS increased gradually during emergence from anaesthesia and may therefore be able to predict recovery of consciousness at the end of anaesthesia. AEPIndex was more able to detect the transition from unconsciousness to consciousness.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
F. Weber, M. Zimmermann, and T. Bein
The Impact of Acoustic Stimulation on the AEP Monitor/2 Derived Composite Auditory Evoked Potential Index Under Awake and Anesthetized Conditions
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2005; 101(2): 435 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Ekman, L. Brudin, and R. Sandin
A Comparison of Bispectral Index and Rapidly Extracted Auditory Evoked Potentials Index Responses to Noxious Stimulation During Sevoflurane Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2004; 99(4): 1141 - 1146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Recart, I. Gasanova, P. F. White, T. Thomas, B. Ogunnaike, M. Hamza, and A. Wang
The Effect of Cerebral Monitoring on Recovery After General Anesthesia: A Comparison of the Auditory Evoked Potential and Bispectral Index Devices with Standard Clinical Practice
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2003; 97(6): 1667 - 1674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
G. Schneider, A. W. Gelb, B. Schmeller, R. Tschakert, and E. Kochs
Detection of awareness in surgical patients with EEG-based indices--bispectral index and patient state index{dagger}{ddagger}
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2003; 91(3): 329 - 335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
S. E. Milne, G. N. C. Kenny, and S. Schraag
Propofol sparing effect of remifentanil using closed-loop anaesthesia{dagger}
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2003; 90(5): 623 - 629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
S. E. Milne, A. Troy, M. G. Irwin, and G. N. C. Kenny
Relationship between bispectral index, auditory evoked potential index and effect-site EC50 for propofol at two clinical end-points
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2003; 90(2): 127 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
L. G. Kevin, A. J. Cunningham, and C. Bolger
Comparison of ocular microtremor and bispectral index during sevoflurane anaesthesia{dagger}
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2002; 89(4): 551 - 555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
F. Jin and F. Chung
Minimizing perioperative adverse events in the elderly{dagger}
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2001; 87(4): 608 - 624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
D. K. Tempe
In Search of a Reliable Awareness Monitor
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2001; 92(4): 801 - 804.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
H.-J. Priebe
The aged cardiovascular risk patient
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2000; 85(5): 763 - 778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. Angel, R. H. Arnott, D. A. Linkens, and C. H. Ting
Somatosensory evoked potentials for closed-loop control of anaesthetic depth using propofol in the urethane-anaesthetized rat
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2000; 85(3): 431 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.