Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katoh, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ikeda, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Katoh, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ikeda, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 82, Issue 4 561-565, Copyright © 1999 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Sevoflurane requirements for tracheal intubation with and without fentanyl

T. Katoh, Y. Nakajima, G. Moriwaki, S. Kobayashi, A. Suzuki, T. Iwamoto, H. Bito and K. Ikeda
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 3600 Handa-cho, Hamamatsu, 431-31 Japan

We studied 80 healthy ASA 1 patients (aged 20-52 yr) to determine if fentanyl affects sevoflurane requirements for achieving 50% probability of no movement in response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation (MAC- TI). Patients were allocated randomly to one of four fentanyl dose groups (0, 1, 2 and 4 micrograms kg-1). Patients in each group received sevoflurane at a pre-selected end-tidal concentration according to an 'up-down' technique. After steady state sevoflurane concentration had been maintained for at least 10 min, fentanyl was administered i.v. Tracheal intubation was performed 4 min after administration of fentanyl, and patients were assessed as moving or not moving. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded before induction of anaesthesia, just before administration of fentanyl, just before laryngoscopy for intubation, and after intubation. The MAC-TI of sevoflurane was 3.55% (95% confidence intervals 3.32-3.78%), and this was reduced markedly to 2.07%, 1.45% and 1.37% by addition of fentanyl 1, 2 and 4 micrograms kg-1, with no significant difference in the reduction between 2 and 4 micrograms kg-1, showing a ceiling effect. Fentanyl attenuated haemodynamic responses (HR and MAP) to tracheal intubation in a dose-dependent manner, even with decreasing concomitant sevoflurane concentration. Fentanyl 4 micrograms kg-1 suppressed the changes in HR and MAP more effectively than fentanyl 1 or 2 micrograms kg-1 at sevoflurane concentrations close to MAC-TI.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. Soulard, F. Babre, M. Bordes, Y. Meymat, F. Sztark, and A. M. Cros
Optimal dose of sufentanil in children for intubation after sevoflurane induction without neuromuscular block
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2009; 102(5): 680 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
S. Alpiger, H. S. Helbo-Hansen, W. Vach, and H. Ording
Efficacy of A-lineTM AEP Monitor as a tool for predicting acceptable tracheal intubation conditions during sevoflurane anaesthesia
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2005; 94(5): 601 - 606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. W. Woods and S. Allam
Tracheal intubation without the use of neuromuscular blocking agents
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2005; 94(2): 150 - 158.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Tanaka and T. Nishikawa
Propofol requirement for insertion of cuffed oropharyngeal airway versus laryngeal mask airway with and without fentanyl: a dose-finding study
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2003; 90(1): 14 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. D. Politis, M. J. Frankland, R. L. James, J. F. ReVille, M. P. Rieker, and B. C. Petree
Factors Associated with Successful Tracheal Intubation of Children with Sevoflurane and No Muscle Relaxant
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2002; 95(3): 615 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Takahashi, T. Mizutani, M. Miyabe, and H. Toyooka
Hemodynamic Responses to Tracheal Intubation with Laryngoscope Versus Lightwand Intubating Device (Trachlight(R)) in Adults with Normal Airway
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2002; 95(2): 480 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
E. Matute, E. Alsina, R. Roses, G. Blanc, C. Perez-Hernandez, and F. Gilsanz
An Inhalation Bolus of Sevoflurane Versus an Intravenous Bolus of Remifentanil for Controlling Hemodynamic Responses to Surgical Stress During Major Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2002; 94(5): 1217 - 1222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Iamaroon, S. Pitimana-aree, C. Prechawai, J. Anusit, K. Somcharoen, and O. Chaiyaroj
Endotracheal Intubation with Thiopental/Succinylcholine or Sevoflurane-Nitrous Oxide Anesthesia in Adults: A Comparative Study
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2001; 92(2): 523 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.