British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 82, Issue 4 525-530, Copyright © 1999 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
G. Rodig, C. Prasser, C. Keyl, A. Liebold and J. Hobbhahn
We have analysed the clinical agreement between two methods of continuous
cardiac output measurement pulse contour analysis (PCCO) and a continuous
thermodilution technique (CCO), were both compared with the intermittent
bolus thermodilution technique (BCO). Measurements were performed in 26
cardiac surgical patients (groups 1 and 2, 13 patients each, with an
ejection fraction > 45% and < 45%, respectively) at 12 selected
times. During operation, mean differences (bias) between PCCO-BCO and
CCO-BCO did not differ in either group. However, phenylephrine-induced
increases in systemic vascular resistance (SVR) by approximately 60%
resulted in significant differences. Significantly higher absolute bias
values of PCCO-BCO compared with CCO-BCO were also found early after
operation in the ICU. Thus PCCO and CCO provided comparable measurements
during coronary bypass surgery. After marked changes in SVR, further
calibration of the PCCO device is necessary.
CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS
Continuous cardiac output measurement: pulse contour analysis vs thermodilution technique in cardiac surgical patients
Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital, Franz-Josef-Strauss Allee 11, D-93042 Regensburg, Germany
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R.-M. B.G.E. Breukers, A.B. J. Groeneveld, R. B.P. de Wilde, and J. R.C. Jansen Transpulmonary versus continuous thermodilution cardiac output after valvular and coronary artery surgery Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, July 1, 2009; 9(1): 4 - 8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Concha, V. F. Mertz, L. I. Cortinez, K. A. Gonzalez, and J. M. Butte Pulse Contour Analysis and Transesophageal Echocardiography: A Comparison of Measurements of Cardiac Output During Laparoscopic Colon Surgery Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2009; 109(1): 114 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Funk, E. W. Moretti, and T. J. Gan Minimally Invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in the Perioperative Setting Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2009; 108(3): 887 - 897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Matthieu, N.-G. Karine, C. Vincent, V. Alain, C. J. Francois, R. Philippe, and S. Francois Cardiac Output Measurement in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation: Pulmonary Artery Catheter Versus Uncalibrated Arterial Pressure Waveform Analysis Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2008; 106(5): 1480 - 1486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Mayer, J. Boldt, M. W. Wolf, J. Lang, and S. Suttner Cardiac Output Derived from Arterial Pressure Waveform Analysis in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: Validity of a Second Generation Device Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2008; 106(3): 867 - 872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S. Halvorsen, A. Sokolov, M. Cvancarova, P. K. Hol, R. Lundblad, and T. I. Tonnessen Continuous cardiac output during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: pulse-contour analyses vs pulmonary artery thermodilution Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2007; 99(4): 484 - 492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Button, L. Weibel, O. Reuthebuch, M. Genoni, A. Zollinger, and C. K. Hofer Clinical evaluation of the FloTrac/VigileoTM system and two established continuous cardiac output monitoring devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2007; 99(3): 329 - 336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Bein, P. Meybohm, E. Cavus, J. Renner, P. H. Tonner, M. Steinfath, J. Scholz, and V. Doerges The Reliability of Pulse Contour-Derived Cardiac Output During Hemorrhage and After Vasopressor Administration Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2007; 105(1): 107 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Mayer, J. Boldt, T. Schollhorn, K. D. Rohm, A. M. Mengistu, and S. Suttner Semi-invasive monitoring of cardiac output by a new device using arterial pressure waveform analysis: a comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in patients undergoing cardiac surgery Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2007; 98(2): 176 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P D Lambiase, A Rinaldi, J Hauck, M Mobb, D Elliott, S Mohammad, J S Gill, and C A Bucknall Non-contact left ventricular endocardial mapping in cardiac resynchronisation therapy Heart, January 1, 2004; 90(1): 44 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. G. Tzenkov, J. P. Pena, G. D. Rocca, and M. G. Costa Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement: pulmonary artery catheter versus aortic transpulmonary technique Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2003; 90(2): 254 - 257. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Della Rocca, M. G. Costa, L. Pompei, C. Coccia, and P. Pietropaoli Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement: pulmonary artery catheter versus aortic transpulmonary technique Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2002; 88(3): 350 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. C. Jansen, J. J. Schreuder, J. P. Mulier, N. T. Smith, J. J. Settels, and K. H. Wesseling A comparison of cardiac output derived from the arterial pressure wave against thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2001; 87(2): 212 - 222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.J. van Lieshout and K.H. Wesseling Editorial II: Continuous cardiac output by pulse contour analysis? Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2001; 86(4): 467 - 468. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. W. F. Linton* and R. A. F. Linton Estimation of changes in cardiac output from the arterial blood pressure waveform in the upper limb{{dagger}},{{dagger}}{{dagger}} Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2001; 86(4): 486 - 496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



