Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (32)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boldt, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boldt, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 82, Issue 2 170-174, Copyright © 1999 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Acute normovolaemic haemodilution vs controlled hypotension for reducing the use of allogeneic blood in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy

J. Boldt, A. Weber, K. Mailer, M. Papsdorf and P. Schuster
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine and the Clinic of Urology, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen, Bremserstr. 79, D-67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany

Blood loss in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy may be substantial. In a randomized, prospective study, we assessed two methods of reducing the need for allogeneic blood transfusion with regard to efficacy and costs. Sixty patients undergoing retropubic radical prostatectomy were allocated randomly to one of three groups. In group 1 (n = 20), acute normovolaemic haemodilution (ANH) was initiated after induction of anaesthesia; autologous blood 15 ml kg-1 was withdrawn and replaced by colloid solutions (gelatin) to maintain haemodynamic stability. In group 2 (n = 20), controlled hypotension was established using sodium nitroprusside (target mean arterial pressure (MAP) approximately 50 mm Hg). Group 3 (n = 20), without manipulations, served as a control group. Troponin T (TnT), a sensitive marker for myocardial ischaemia, and various coagulation variables were measured in the perioperative period. Packed red blood cells (PRBC) were given when haemoglobin concentration was less than 7 g dl-1. Cost calculations did not include hospital overhead costs or staff costs. In the ANH group, mean 1278 (SD 150) ml of autologous blood were withdrawn. Significantly more volume was infused in the ANH patients (gelatin 2450 (550) ml) than in the two other groups. Coagulation data (platelet count, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), fibrinogen, antithrombin III (AT III), D-dimers) did not differ significantly between the three groups. The hypotension group had significantly lower blood loss (1260 (570) ml), whereas the ANH (1820 (680) ml) and control group (1920 (590) ml) did not differ significantly. Patients in the hypotension group needed significantly less PRBC (total 14 units; 75% of patients did not need PRBC) than the ANH (total 21 units; 55% of patients did not need PRBC) or control patients (total 28 units; 40% of patients did not need PRBC). Total costs were lowest in the hypotension group (41% less than in the control patients) (P < 0.05). We conclude that the use of hypotension during radical prostatectomy resulted in approximately 40% reduction in total transfusion costs. ANH was less effective and more costly than controlled hypotension.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
G. Sanders, N. Mellor, K. Rickards, A. Rushton, I. Christie, J. Nicholl, A. Copplestone, and K. Hosie
Prospective randomized controlled trial of acute normovolaemic haemodilution in major gastrointestinal surgery
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2004; 93(6): 775 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
S. W. Suttner, S. N. Piper, K. Lang, I. Huttner, B. Kumle, and J. Boldt
Cerebral effects and blood sparing efficiency of sodium nitroprusside-induced hypotension alone and in combination with acute normovolaemic haemodilution
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2001; 87(5): 699 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. W. Suttner, J. Boldt, C. C. Schmidt, S. N. Piper, P. Schuster, and B. Kumle
The Effects of Sodium Nitroprusside-Induced Hypotension on Splanchnic Perfusion and Hepatocellular Integrity
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 1999; 89(6): 1371 - 1371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.