Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, R.
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, R.
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 81, Issue 6 972-973, Copyright © 1998 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


SHORT COMMUNICATIONS

Topical anaesthesia of intact skin: liposome-encapsulated tetracaine vs EMLA

R. Fisher, O. Hung, M. Mezei and R. Stewart
Discipline of Family Practice, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland, Canada; Department of Anaesthesia, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada; College of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

In this randomized, double-blind study, we have compared the ability of 5% liposome-encapsulated tetracaine (amethocaine) (LET) vs 5% eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA) to produce local anaesthesia of intact skin in 40 healthy volunteers. Volunteers had both preparations applied to their forearms under an occlusive dressing for 1 h. Superficial anaesthesia was measured by a total of nine 1-mm pinpricks on each arm. Deeper anaesthesia was assessed by single insertion of a sterile 22-gauge needle to a depth of 3 mm and pain was reported on a visual analogue scale (VAS). If the volunteer perceived greater than four of the 1-mm pinpricks, the 3-mm insertion was not performed. Results showed that the number of pinpricks perceived was significantly less (P < 0.01) for LET (median 1.0; range 0-9) vs EMLA (1.5; 0-9). In volunteers who had deeper anaesthesia assessed, there was no significant difference (P = 0.065) in VAS scores for LET (mean 1.5 (SD 1.4); n = 34) vs EMLA (2.4 (2.1); n = 28). Overall anaesthetic effect, as ranked by all of the subjects, was significantly better for LET compared with EMLA (P = 0.024). We have demonstrated that when applied in equal volumes, 5% LET produced better superficial local anaesthesia than EMLA.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. A. Howell and A. Chauhan
Bupivacaine Binding to Pegylated Liposomes
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2009; 109(2): 678 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
W. T. Zempsky, J. Bean-Lijewski, R. E. Kauffman, J. L. Koh, S. V. Malviya, J. B. Rose, P. T. Richards, and D. J. Gennevois
Needle-Free Powder Lidocaine Delivery System Provides Rapid Effective Analgesia for Venipuncture or Cannulation Pain in Children: Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of Venipuncture and Venous Cannulation Pain After Fast-Onset Needle-Free Powder Lidocaine or Placebo Treatment Trial
Pediatrics, May 1, 2008; 121(5): 979 - 987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Franz-Montan, A. L. R. Silva, K. Cogo, C. d. C. Bergamaschi, M. C. Volpato, J. Ranali, E. de Paula, and F. C. Groppo
Liposome-Encapsulated Ropivacaine for Topical Anesthesia of Human Oral Mucosa
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2007; 104(6): 1528 - 1531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
Y.-C. P. Arai and W. Ueda
Warm Steaming Enhances the Topical Anesthetic Effect of Lidocaine
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2004; 98(4): 982 - 985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.