British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 81, Issue 5 713-717, Copyright © 1998 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
WDR. Writer, R. Stienstra, J. M. Eddleston, S. P. Gatt, R. Griffin, B. B. Gutsche, T. H. Joyce, C. Hedlund, K. Heeroma and D. Selander
In this prospective meta-analysis, we have evaluated the effect of epidural
analgesia with ropivacaine for pain in labour on neonatal outcome and mode
of delivery compared with bupivacaine. In six randomized, double-blind
studies, 403 labouring women, primigravidae and multiparae, received
epidural analgesia with ropivacaine or bupivacaine 2.5 mg ml-1. The drugs
were administered as intermittent boluses in four studies and by continuous
infusion in two. Apgar scores, neurological and adaptive capacity scores
(NACS), degree of motor block and mode of delivery were recorded. The
studies were designed prospectively to fit meta-analysis of the pooled
results. Results showed similar pain relief and consumption of the two
drugs. In the vaginally delivered neonates, NACS scores were approximately
equal for both groups at 2 h, but at 24 h there were fewer infants with
NACS less than 35 in the ropivacaine compared with the bupivacaine group
(2.8% vs 7.6%; P < 0.05). Spontaneous vaginal deliveries occurred more
frequently overall with ropivacaine than with bupivacaine (58% vs 49%; P
< 0.05) and instrumental deliveries (forceps and vacuum extraction) less
frequently (27% vs 40%; P < 0.01), while the frequency of Caesarean
section was similar between groups. The intensity of motor block was lower
with ropivacaine. There were no significant differences in adverse events.
CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS
Neonatal outcome and mode of delivery after epidural analgesia for labour with ropivacaine and bupivacaine: a prospective meta-analysis
Department of Anaesthesia, IWK Grace Health Centre, Halifax, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Anaesthesia, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK; Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Hospital for Women, Paddington, Australia; Department of Anaesthesia, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK; Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, USA; Clinical Research and Development, Astra Pain Control AB, S-151 85 Sodertalje, Sweden
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Smet, E. Vlaminck, and M. Vercauteren Randomized controlled trial of patient-controlled epidural analgesia after orthopaedic surgery with sufentanil and ropivacaine 0.165% or levobupivacaine 0.125% Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2008; 100(1): 99 - 103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Beilin, N. R. Guinn, H. H. Bernstein, J. Zahn, S. Hossain, and C. A. Bodian Local Anesthetics and Mode of Delivery: Bupivacaine Versus Ropivacaine Versus Levobupivacaine Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2007; 105(3): 756 - 763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. B. Lee, W. D. Ngan Kee, F. F. Ng, T. K. Lau, and E. L. Y. Wong Epidural Infusions of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine for Labor Analgesia: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Obstetric Outcome Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2004; 98(4): 1145 - 1152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Senard, A. Kaba, M. J. Jacquemin, L. M. Maquoi, M.-P. N. Geortay, P. D. Honore, M. L. Lamy, and J. L. Joris Epidural Levobupivacaine 0.1% or Ropivacaine 0.1% Combined with Morphine Provides Comparable Analgesia After Abdominal Surgery Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2004; 98(2): 389 - 394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. Polley and M. O. Columb Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine: Concentrating on Dosing! Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2003; 96(5): 1251 - 1253. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Halpern and V. Walsh Epidural Ropivacaine Versus Bupivacaine for Labor: A Meta-Analysis Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2003; 96(5): 1473 - 1479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Vercauteren, G. Hans, K. De Decker, and H. A. Adriaensen Levobupivacaine Combined with Sufentanil and Epinephrine for Intrathecal Labor Analgesia: A Comparison with Racemic Bupivacaine Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2001; 93(4): 996 - 1000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Whiteside and J. A. W. Wildsmith Developments in local anaesthetic drugs Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2001; 87(1): 27 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Fernandez-Guisasola, M. L. Serrano, B. Cobo, L. Munoz, A. Plaza, C. Trigo, and S. Garcia del Valle A Comparison of 0.0625% Bupivacaine with Fentanyl and 0.1% Ropivacaine with Fentanyl for Continuous Epidural Labor Analgesia Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2001; 92(5): 1261 - 1265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. T-L. Choi, S. H. Halpern, N. Malik, A. R. Jadad, M. R. Tramer, and B. Walder Examining the Evidence in Anesthesia Literature: A Critical Appraisal of Systematic Reviews Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2001; 92(3): 700 - 709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N.S. Morton Editorial II: Ropivacaine in children Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2000; 85(3): 344 - 346. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

