Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by James, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Patrick, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by James, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Patrick, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 81, Issue 4 507-510, Copyright © 1998 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Comparison of epidural bolus administration of 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.1% bupivacaine with 0.0002% fentanyl for analgesia during labour

K. S. James, E. McGrady, I. Quasim and A. Patrick
Glasgow Royal Maternity Hospital, Glasgow

We have compared analgesia during labour provided by two epidural drug regimens, in a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Group A received 10-ml bolus doses of 0.1% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2 micrograms ml-1 while group B received 0.25% plain bupivacaine 10 ml. Analgesia provided by both techniques was similar, but women in group A retained motor power in their legs and 60% chose to get out of bed. Duration of labour and time from insertion of the epidural to delivery was similar in both groups, but in group A, duration of the second stage was significantly shorter (P = 0.0003; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.17, -0.27 h) and the incidence of forceps delivery was lower (P = 0.032). Maternal satisfaction with epidural analgesia, as assessed by VAS, was higher in group A (P = 0.04; 95% CI -0.001, 10.001).
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.