British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 81, Issue 2 224-229, Copyright © 1998 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
S. A. Ross, R. Kato and P. Foex
The protective efficacy of halogenated anaesthetics on myocardial injury
has never been compared during early reperfusion and late reperfusion in an
in vivo animal model. We compared recovery of left ventricular function
under isoflurane (0.5 MAC) and halothane (0.5 MAC) anaesthesia after a
brief period of regional ischaemia (15 min) in acutely instrumented
rabbits. Rabbits were instrumented for the measurement of regional segment
length and left ventricular pressure. Rabbits receiving isoflurane showed
greater recovery of systolic shortening fraction (%SS) both during early
and late reperfusion compared with halothane anaesthesia. Isoflurane
protected the post- ischaemic myocardium to a greater extent than halothane
anaesthesia. Early recovery of contractile function may be a predictor of
contractile recovery during the later stages of reperfusion.
LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS
Early and late post-ischaemic recovery of contractile function is affected to different degrees by isoflurane and halothane in the anaesthetized rabbit model
Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, The Radcliffe Infirmary, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6HE
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?