Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mecklenburgh, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mapleson, W. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mecklenburgh, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mapleson, W. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 80, Issue 4 422-433, Copyright © 1998 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Ventilatory assistance and respiratory muscle activity. 1: Interaction in healthy volunteers

J. S. Mecklenburgh and W. W. Mapleson
Department of Anaesthetics and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XN

We have investigated the response of 12 normal, healthy subjects to resistance loading and ventilator assistance of spontaneous breathing. Three ventilators, the Hamilton Veolar, Engstrom Erica and Puritan Bennett 7200, were used to provide synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation and two levels of pressure assistance. Total respiratory elastance and resistance were measured. The equivalent (negative) pressure of respiratory muscle activity (pmus) was then calculated from measurement of flow and pressure at the mouth. With ventilatory assistance, subjects maintained frequency, decreased inspiratory time and the magnitude of pmus, but increased tidal volume, thus not taking full advantage of ventilatory assistance. The waveform of pmus varied in detail within and between subjects and conditions, but the all- subject mean waveforms showed for all conditions a consistency of trajectory. Increasing the level of assistance decreased the duration and hence the (negative) peak value of pmus. The results suggest that some waveforms of flow or pressure from the ventilators may be more acceptable to patients than others, and that different patients may prefer different waveforms.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.