Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (41)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Constant, I.
Right arrow Articles by Murat, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Constant, I.
Right arrow Articles by Murat, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 80, Issue 3 294-298, Copyright © 1998 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Addition of clonidine or fentanyl to local anaesthetics prolongs the duration of surgical analgesia after single shot caudal block in children

I. Constant, O. Gall, L. Gouyet, M. Chauvin and I. Murat
Department of Anaesthesia, Hopital d'enfants Armand Trousseau, Pairs, France; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Hopital Ambroise Pare, Boulogne, France

Caudal anaesthesia is indicated for surgical procedures lasting less than 90 min. Fentanyl and clonidine are known to prolong postoperative caudal analgesia, but there are no data on their effect on duration of surgical analgesia. We evaluated if the addition of clonidine or fentanyl to local anaesthetics prolonged the duration of surgical analgesia after single shot caudal block in children in a randomized, double-blind study. We studied 64 children, aged 6-108 months, undergoing bilateral correction of vesicoureteral reflux which was expected to last more than 90 min. Patients were allocated to one of four groups: group O received 1 ml kg-1 of a mixture of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine and 1% lidocaine in equal parts; group F received the same mixture of local anaesthetics in addition to fentanyl 1 microgram kg-1; group C received the same mixture of local anaesthetics in addition to clonidine 1.5 micrograms kg-1; and group C + F received the same mixture of local anaesthetics in addition to fentanyl 0.5 microgram kg-1 and clonidine 0.75 microgram kg-1. Single shot caudal block was sufficient in only 57% of children in group O compared with 93% in groups C and F and 86% in group C + F (P = 0.035). Global assessment of anaesthesia, defined as the time from caudal injection to the first administration of analgesic (either during or after surgery), was significantly longer in the three groups of children who received additives compared with local anaesthetics alone (P = 0.035), but there were no differences between the three additive groups. Vomiting was observed only in children who received fentanyl. Addition of clonidine or fentanyl to local anaesthetics prolonged the duration of surgical analgesia of caudal block, allowing single shot caudal anaesthesia to be recommended for surgery lasting 90-150 minutes. Clonidine had some advantages over fentanyl as it did not produce clinically significant side effects.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. M. El-Hennawy, A. M. Abd-Elwahab, A. M. Abd-Elmaksoud, H. S. El-Ozairy, and S. R. Boulis
Addition of clonidine or dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine prolongs caudal analgesia in children
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2009; 103(2): 268 - 274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. R. Vetter, D. Carvallo, J. L. Johnson, M. S. Mazurek, and R. G. Presson Jr
A Comparison of Single-Dose Caudal Clonidine, Morphine, or Hydromorphone Combined with Ropivacaine in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Ureteral Reimplantation
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2007; 104(6): 1356 - 1363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. Cucchiaro and A. Ganesh
The Effects of Clonidine on Postoperative Analgesia After Peripheral Nerve Blockade in Children
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2007; 104(3): 532 - 537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
Y. Kawaraguchi, T. Otomo, C. Ota, N. Uchida, A. Taniguchi, and S. Inoue
A prospective, double-blind, randomized trial of caudal block using ropivacaine 0.2% with or without fentanyl 1 {micro}g kg-1 in children
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2006; 97(6): 858 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Rochette, O. Raux, R. Troncin, C. Dadure, R. Verdier, and X. Capdevila
Clonidine Prolongs Spinal Anesthesia in Newborns: A Prospective Dose-Ranging Study
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2004; 98(1): 56 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
D. A. H. de Beer and M. L. Thomas
Caudal additives in children--solutions or problems?
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2003; 90(4): 487 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
L. K. Diaz and F. Cantu
Hemodynamic Response to Caudal Epidural Clonidine in a Pediatric Cardiac Patient
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2003; 96(1): 88 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. B. Berde and N. F. Sethna
Analgesics for the Treatment of Pain in Children
N. Engl. J. Med., October 3, 2002; 347(14): 1094 - 1103.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. Cucchiaro, P. De Lagausie, A. El-Ghonemi, and Y. Nivoche
Single-Dose Caudal Anesthesia for Major Intraabdominal Operations in High-Risk Infants
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2001; 92(6): 1439 - 1441.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. Berde and B. Cairns
Developmental Pharmacology Across Species: Promise and Problems
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2000; 91(1): 1 - 5.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.