Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Langeron, O.
Right arrow Articles by Coriat, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Langeron, O.
Right arrow Articles by Coriat, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 78, Issue 6 701-706, Copyright © 1997 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Comparison of the effects of ketamine-midazolam with those of fentanyl- midazolam on cortical somatosensory evoked potentials during major spine surgery

O. Langeron, F. Lille, O. Zerhouni, G. Orliaguet, G. Saillant, B. Riou and P. Coriat
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere, Paris VI University, Paris, France; Department of Neurophysiology, Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere, Paris VI University, Paris, France; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere, Paris VI University, Paris, France; Department of Anaesthesiology, Hôpital Necker, Paris, France

Cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (CSEP) allow monitoring of spinal cord function during surgery. Ketamine has been shown to enhance CSEP amplitude, but there is no previous study comparing its effects with those of other anaesthetic regimens. Therefore, we have compared the effects of ketamine with those of fentanyl, both combined with midazolam, on CSEP monitoring during major spine surgery. Twenty patients with normal preoperative CSEP were allocated randomly to a ketamine or fentanyl group. Anaesthesia was induced with ketamine 3 mg kg-1 or fentanyl 6 micrograms kg-1 i.v., and midazolam 0.3 mg kg-1 i.v in both groups, and maintained with continuous i.v infusion of ketamine 2 mg kg-1 h-1 or fentanyl 3 micrograms kg-1 h-1, combined in both groups with midazolam 0.15 mg kg-1 h-1 and 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen. CSEP were elicited by tibial posterior nerve stimulation and measured P1 and N1 latencies, and P1-N1 amplitude, CSEP were recorded before and after induction, at 15 min, 1 and 2 h after induction, during skin closure and after removal of nitrous oxide. Both groups were comparable in characteristics, duration of surgery, mean arterial pressure and temperature. CSEP latencies were not significantly affected in either group. CSEP amplitude decreased significantly over time in the fentanyl group (from mean 2.02 (SEM 0.41) to 0.95 (0.17) microV, P < 0.05), but not in the ketamine group (from 1.33 (0.36) to 1.05 (0.31) microV, ns). Nevertheless, we did not observe any significant differences in amplitudes or latencies between the two groups. The delay in obtaining the first voluntary postoperative motor response was significantly greater in the ketamine group (170 (54) vs 55 (17) min, P < 0.01). Both ketamine and fentanyl allowed us to obtain reliable CSEP during major spine surgery, and there were no significant difference between these two anaesthetic regimens for CSEP monitoring, but a longer delay for voluntary postoperative motor assessment was observed in the ketamine group.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.