British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 78, Issue 6 637-641, Copyright © 1997 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
A. J. Byrne and J. G. Jones
Eleven anaesthetists completed a simulated anaesthetic which was
deliberately complicated by a slow progressive bradycardia followed by an
episode of severe bronchospasm. After the simulation, each anaesthetist was
asked to complete an anaesthetic chart and a critical incident report.
Considerable discrepancies were found between the anaesthetists' written
accounts, a videotape of their performance and actual data from the
simulator. During the simulations, all of the anaesthetists reacted
appropriately and treated their "patient" successfully but their written
accounts showed a tendency to record "typical" rather than actual events
and to ignore events not consistent with their final diagnosis. Only four
anaesthetists mentioned bradycardia in their written description and none
accurately described the changes in arterial pressure during the episode of
bronchospasm. The findings are in keeping with other studies which suggest
that people record events as "schemata" rather than as collections of
discrete facts. These results have significant implications for those
involved in the teaching of anaesthesia and in the analysis of critical
incidents.
CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS
Inaccurate reporting of simulated critical anaesthetic incidents
Department of Anaesthesia, Addenbrooke's Hospital; University of Cambridge and Addenbrooke's Hospital; Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. D. Michelson Simulation in Orthopaedic Education: An Overview of Theory and Practice J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2006; 88(6): 1405 - 1411. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A J Byrne, M T Blagrove, and S J P McDougall Dynamic confidence during simulated clinical tasks Postgrad. Med. J., December 1, 2005; 81(962): 785 - 788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

