Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poblete, B.
Right arrow Articles by Suter, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poblete, B.
Right arrow Articles by Suter, P. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 78, Issue 2 123-127, Copyright © 1997 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Metabolic effects of i.v. propacetamol, metamizol or external cooling in critically ill febrile sedated patients

B. Poblete, J. A. Romand, C. Pichard, P. Konig and P. M. Suter
Division of Surgical Intensive Care, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology and Surgical Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211 Geneve 14, Switzerland; Division of Nutrition and Dietetics, Department of Internal Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211 Geneve 14, Switzerland

We have measured the metabolic response to sequential administration of propacetamol, metamizol and/or external cooling in 20 febrile patients under sedation and analgesia and during mechanical ventilation. There was no change in temperature (T degree) after propacetamol therapy, whereas after metamizol only a small decrease was noted (from 38.9 (SEM 0.2) to 38.5 (0.3) degrees C; P = 0.02). External cooling produced a significant decrease in T degree (39.1 (0.2) to 37.1 (0.2) degrees C; P < 0.0001) accompanied by a decrease in energy expenditure (EE) (2034 (73) to 1791 (88) kcal day-1; P < 0.004). Heart rate and minute ventilation decreased significantly in parallel. There were no other changes in haemodynamics or pulmonary gas exchanges. We conclude that propacetamol and metamizol did not produce a clinically significant decrease in T degree in febrile ICU patients whereas external cooling decreased both T degree and EE. The parallel decrease in body temperature and EE seemed to be related to opioid administration or sedation, or both.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
S.A. Mayer, C. Commichau, N. Scarmeas, M. Presciutti, J. Bates, and D. Copeland
Clinical trial of an air-circulating cooling blanket for fever control in critically ill neurologic patients
Neurology, February 13, 2001; 56(3): 292 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
V. Gozzoli, P. Schottker, P. M. Suter, and B. Ricou
Is It Worth Treating Fever in Intensive Care Unit Patients?: Preliminary Results From a Randomized Trial of the Effect of External Cooling
Arch Intern Med, January 8, 2001; 161(1): 121 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.