Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, N. W.
Right arrow Articles by Vengco, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, N. W.
Right arrow Articles by Vengco, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 77, Issue 4 492-495, Copyright © 1996 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Neuromuscular blocking action of suxamethonium after antagonism of vecuronium by edrophonium, pyridostigmine or neostigmine

N. W. Fleming, S. Macres, J. F. Antognini and J. Vengco
Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA

The reported effects of edrophonium on a subsequent dose of suxamethonium are variable and the effects of pyridostigmine have not been evaluated extensively. We have studied this interaction in patients anaesthetized with propofol and sufentanil. After recovery from an initial bolus (1 mg kg-1) of suxamethonium, vecuronium was infused to produce 75% block. After 30 min, the infusion was discontinued and saline 5 ml, edrophonium 0.75 mg kg-1, pyridostigmine 0.24 mg kg-1 or neostigmine 0.05 mg kg-1 was given. Fifteen minutes later the mean durations of a second bolus of suxamethonium were: 10.5 (SD 3.9) min (saline), 10.9 (3.7) min (edrophonium), 18.7 (5.4) min (pyridostigmine) and 23.8 (7.4) min (neostigmine). Corresponding plasma cholinesterase activities (percentage of baseline) were: 91 (18), 87 (9), 21 (10) and 52 (26). When both treatment groups and individual patients were compared, the changes in duration of action did not correlate with changes in cholinesterase activity. These data suggest that other mechanisms in addition to cholinesterase inhibition may contribute to this drug interaction.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.