Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ashurst, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gouws, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ashurst, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gouws, E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 77, Issue 4 468-472, Copyright © 1996 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Use of a mechanical simulator for training in applying cricoid pressure

N. Ashurst, C. C. Rout, D. A. Rocke and E. Gouws
Department of Anaesthetics, University of Natal, Durban, South Africa; Institute for Biostatistics, Medical Research Council, Durban, South Africa

Using an airway management training model, we have assessed anaesthesia personnel in their use of correct cricoid force and ability to retain this skill after a short training programme. A perspex device, working on a hydraulic principle, was used to measure cricoid pressure when applied to the model. After initial assessment at two levels of cricoid force (20 and 40 N), participants undertook additional training on 3 consecutive days. Thereafter, available participants underwent reassessment at 14-21 days. Forty-nine anaesthetic assistants and anaesthetists underwent initial assessment and 18 completed the full training and reassessment. Untrained, the majority (63%) of participants applied inadequate cricoid force with a wide variation (mean 16.8 (SD 9.3) (range 4.5-43.0) at 20 N and 32.9 (13.3) (14.9-74) at 40 N). After a single training session there was a marked improvement in application of cricoid force. Two additional training sessions did not provide further improvement. After 14-21 days the ability of participants to apply correct cricoid force was retained by 72% of subjects. Those who applied inadequate cricoid force initially were more likely to do so even after training. Most subjects applied too great a cricoid force in the first 5 s of application followed by a progressive loss of force during the next 20 s. This trend improved after training. We conclude that the majority of untrained personnel apply inadequate cricoid force, placing patients at risk of aspiration of gastric contents. While a simple training programme improved application of cricoid force, retained for up to 3 weeks, there was often a substantial decrease in the force applied to the cricoid during a single application, even after training.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.