British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 77, Issue 4 453-457, Copyright © 1996 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
A. T. Rheineck-Leyssius, C. J. Kalkman and A. Trouwborst
We have studied the influence of motivation of care providers on the
incidence and duration of postoperative hypoxaemia in the recovery room. In
a prospective, switch-back designed cohort study, we have compared the
incidence of low pulse oximeter saturation values (SpO2) during
pre-intervention, intervention and post-intervention phases. Low SpO2
values were classified as either hypoxaemia (SpO2 < or = 90%, minimum
duration 1 min) or artefact. Pulse oximetry trend data from 1350 patients,
450 in each group, were analysed. During the intervention phase, motivation
was increased by adding an explicit instruction to prevent and treat low
SpO2 values and making personnel aware that they were being studied
(Hawthorne effect). The incidence of hypoxaemia decreased significantly
from 17.8% during the pre- intervention phase to 11.6% during the
intervention phase (relative risk (RR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI)
0.47-0.90; P < 0.01). The incidence of severe hypoxaemia (SpO2 < or =
85%, 1 min) decreased from 7.8% to 3.3% (RR 0.43, CI 0.24-0.76; P <
0.01). The number of patients who had severe hypoxaemia for more than 5 min
decreased from 13 to 1 (RR 0.08, CI 0.02-0.36; P < 0.01). In the
post-intervention period, the incidence of hypoxaemia returned to
pre-intervention values. The results of this study suggest that motivation
of care providers to prevent and treat low SpO2 is an important determinant
of postoperative hypoxaemia in the recovery room.
CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS
Influence of motivation of care providers on the incidence of postoperative hypoxaemia in the recovery room
Department of Anaesthesia, Twenteborg Hospital, PO Box 7600, 7600 SZ Almelo, The Netherlands
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Pedersen, A. M. Moller, and B. D. Pedersen Pulse Oximetry for Perioperative Monitoring: Systematic Review of Randomized, Controlled Trials Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2003; 96(2): 426 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. KREINER, E. BETANCOR, and G. T. CLARK Occlusal stabilization appliances: Evidence of their efficacy J Am Dent Assoc, June 1, 2001; 132(6): 770 - 777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Malviya, P. I. Reynolds, T. Voepel-Lewis, M. Siewert, D. Watson, A. R. Tait, and K. Tremper False Alarms and Sensitivity of Conventional Pulse Oximetry Versus the Masimo SETTM Technology in the Pediatric Postanesthesia Care Unit Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2000; 90(6): 1336 - 1340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

