British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 77, Issue 3 365-369, Copyright © 1996 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
C. A. Greim, N. Roewer, G. Laux and J. Schulte am Esch
We have examined the usefulness of transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE)
and automated endocardium detection for on-line calculation of left
ventricular stroke volume. In 12 of 15 patients undergoing abdominal
surgery, stroke volume was derived continuously from the multiple discs
(MD) and area-length (AL) methods and compared with stroke volume
calculated by thermodilution. In 10 patients (80%), more than three
manipulations of the ultrasound transducer were required before
measurements. Linear regression analysis of automated TOE methods and
thermodilution revealed weak correlations (r < 0.75) for stroke volume
(114 matched pairs) and its changes (105 matched pairs). Correlation of
percentage changes in stroke volume calculated by thermodilution with those
derived from MD (r = 0.85) and AL (r = 0.79) was better. Changes in MD (AL)
derived stroke volume by more than 20% identified changes in
thermodilution-derived stroke volume greater than 20% (n = 57) with a
sensitivity of 74% (70%) and a specificity of 82% (79%). Signal
instability, lack of accuracy and only a moderate trend capability
currently limit the intraoperative usefulness of automated TOE techniques
for continuous estimation of stroke volume from a single long-axis plane.
CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS
On-line estimation of left ventricular stroke volume using transoesophageal echocardiography and acoustic quantification
Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital of Wurzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str.Z, D-97080, Wurzburg, Germany; Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Mantha, M. F. Roizen, L. A. Fleisher, R. Thisted, and J. Foss Comparing Methods of Clinical Measurement: Reporting Standards for Bland and Altman Analysis Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2000; 90(3): 593 - 602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
