Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hammaren, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hynynen, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hammaren, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hynynen, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 77, Issue 3 360-364, Copyright © 1996 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Cardiopulmonary bypass-induced changes in plasma concentrations of propofol and in auditory evoked potentials

E. Hammaren, A. Yli-Hankala, P. H. Rosenberg and M. Hynynen
Department of Anaesthesia, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, FIN-00290 Helsinki, Finland

Unbound, rather than total, plasma concentrations may be related to the anaesthetic action of propofol. Therefore, we measured plasma concentrations of propofol and recorded Nb wave latencies of auditory evoked potentials (AEP) during continuous infusion of propofol in 15 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. After induction of anaesthesia with fentanyl, propofol was infused continuously at a rate of 10 mg kg-1 h-1 for 20 min, and then the rate was reduced to 3 mg kg-1 h-1. Administration of heparin before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) did not affect total or unbound propofol concentration. Initiation of CPB decreased mean total propofol concentration from 2.6 to 1.7 micrograms ml-1 (P < 0.01). Simultaneously, mean unbound propofol concentration remained at 0.06 micrograms ml-1 because of a slight increase in the mean free fraction of plasma propofol (from 2.3 to 3.5%; P > 0.05). During hypothermic CPB, mean total propofol concentration increased to concentrations measured before bypass (to 2.1 micrograms ml-1; P > 0.05 vs value before CPB) and the mean unbound propofol concentration was at its highest (0.07 microgram ml-1; P < 0.05 vs value before heparin). After CPB and administration of protamine, the mean total propofol concentration remained lowered (1.7 micrograms ml-1; P < 0.05 vs value before heparin) and the mean unbound propofol concentration returned to the level measured before heparin (P < 0.001 vs value during hypothermia). The latency of the Nb wave from recordings of AEP increased after induction of anaesthesia, reached its maximum during hypothermia and was prolonged during the subsequent phases of the study. The latency of the Nb wave did not correlate with total or unbound propofol concentration. We conclude that the changes in total and unbound concentrations of plasma propofol were not parallel in patients undergoing CABG. During CPB or at any other time during the CABG procedure, the unbound propofol concentration did not decrease and Nb wave latency was prolonged compared with baseline values measured after induction of anaesthesia before the start of CPB.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PerfusionHome page
P. Mathew, G. Puri, and R. Dhaliwal
Propofol requirement titrated to bispectral index: a comparison between hypothermic and normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass
Perfusion, January 1, 2009; 24(1): 27 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J. Ahonen, A. Sahlman, A. Yli-Hankala, H. Eriksson, A. Nemlander, J. Ramo, and M. Salmenpera
No effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on hypnosis in patients anaesthetized with propofol and alfentanil
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2004; 92(1): 137 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
K. Yoshitani, M. Kawaguchi, M. Takahashi, K. Kitaguchi, and H. Furuya
Plasma propofol concentration and EEG burst suppression ratio during normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2003; 90(2): 122 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.