Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (49)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meretoja, O. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wirtavuori, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meretoja, O. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wirtavuori, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 76, Issue 6 767-771, Copyright © 1996 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Sevoflurane-nitrous oxide or halothane-nitrous oxide for paediatric bronchoscopy and gastroscopy

O. A. Meretoja, T. Taivainen, L. Raiha, R. Korpela and K. Wirtavuori
Department of Anaesthesiology, Children's Hospital University of Helsinki, FIN-00290 Helsinki, Finland

We have studied 120 infants and children, in three age groups (3-11 months, 1-5 yr and 6-15 yr), to compare anaesthesia with sevoflurane or halothane for bronchoscopy or gastroscopy, or both. Premedication or i.v. anaesthetic agents were not used. Patients were allocated randomly to receive either 7% sevoflurane or 3% halothane in 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen for induction of anaesthesia. The same inspired mixture was continued during bronchoscopy while the concentration of the inhalation agent was reduced by 50% during gastroscopy. Induction times were shorter for infants than for children and shorter for sevoflurane than for halothane. Cardiac arrhythmias were significantly more frequent during halothane than during sevoflurane anaesthesia. Physiological and psychomotor recovery were more rapid after sevoflurane than after halothane. At 24-h follow-up, children who received sevoflurane had significantly less nausea and vomiting. We conclude that sevoflurane was superior to halothane for paediatric bronchoscopy and gastroscopy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
L.-h. Chen, X. Zhang, S.-q. Li, Y.-q. Liu, T.-y. Zhang, and J.-z. Wu
The Risk Factors for Hypoxemia in Children Younger than 5 Years Old Undergoing Rigid Bronchoscopy for Foreign Body Removal
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2009; 109(4): 1079 - 1084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. C. Weldon, M. Bell, and T. Craddock
The Effect of Caudal Analgesia on Emergence Agitation in Children After Sevoflurane Versus Halothane Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2004; 98(2): 321 - 326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
D. H. Green, P. Townsend, O. Bagshaw, and M. A. Stokes
Nodal rhythm and bradycardia during inhalation induction with sevoflurane in infants: a comparison of incremental and high-concentration techniques
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2000; 85(3): 368 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
H. Viitanen, G. Baer, H. Koivu, and P. Annila
The Hemodynamic and Holter-Electrocardiogram Changes During Halothane and Sevoflurane Anesthesia for Adenoidectomy in Children Aged One to Three Years
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 1999; 89(6): 1423 - 1423.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
W. Habre, P. Scalfaro, C. Sims, K. Tiller, and P. D. Sly
Respiratory Mechanics During Sevoflurane Anesthesia in Children With and Without Asthma
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 1999; 89(5): 1177 - 1177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.