Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pasch, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pasch, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 76, Issue 3 405-411, Copyright © 1996 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Radial artery tonometry: moderately accurate but unpredictable technique of continuous non-invasive arterial pressure measurement

B. M. Weiss, D. R. Spahn, H. Rahmig, R. Rohling and T. Pasch
Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland

Radial artery tonometry provides continuous measurement of non-invasive arterial pressure (CNAP) by a sensor positioned above the radial artery. An inflatable upper arm cuff enables intermittent oscillometric calibration. CNAP was compared with invasive radial artery pressure recordings from the opposite wrist in 22 high-risk surgical patients with an inter-arm oscillometric mean arterial pressure difference < or = 10 mm Hg. Oscillometric, tonometric and invasive digital pressure values, and invasive and CNAP waveforms were obtained by the same instrument (Colin BP-508). Correlation coefficients (r) of invasive vs oscillometric values (n = 481 pairs) were 0.83, 0.90 and 0.92, and mean absolute errors of oscillometry were 7.6, 4.7, and 2.6 mm Hg for systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures, respectively. Correlation was poor for systolic (r = 0.80), diastolic (r = 0.77) and mean (r = 0.84) invasive vs CNAP values (n = 1375). Compared with oscillometry, mean absolute errors of 15.2, 10.9 and 9.4 mm Hg for systolic, diastolic and mean CNAP, respectively, were significantly (P < 0.001) higher. Mean prediction errors of CNAP, compared with invasive values, were -5.8 (SD 14.2) mm Hg for systolic, +7.2 (8.3) mm Hg for diastolic and +3.9 (8.8) mm Hg for mean arterial pressure. Individual patient accuracy of CNAP was assessed as good (individual prediction error < or = 5 (8) mm Hg and individual absolute error < or = 10 mm Hg) in seven patients, as acceptable (< or = 10 (12) and < or = 15 mm Hg) in 11 patients, and as inadequate in four of 22 patients. Individual accuracy of oscillometry was good or acceptable in all 22 patients. The trend in CNAP changes (difference between consecutive measurements) was sufficiently accurate during induction of anaesthesia, as only 47 (7.6%), 14 (2.3%) and 27 (4.4%) of 616 systolic, diastolic and mean CNAP values differed by more than 10 mm Hg of invasive pressure trends. We conclude that: intermittent oscillometry provides accurate arterial pressure monitoring; CNAP measurements offer a reliable trend indicator of pressure changes during induction of anaesthesia and may be considered an alternative to invasive pressure measurements, should arterial cannulation be difficult in an awake patient; and accuracy of absolute CNAP values is only moderate and unpredictable, thus radial artery tonometry should not replace invasive monitoring in high-risk patients during major surgical procedures.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. M. Janelle and N. Gravenstein
An Accuracy Evaluation of the T-Line(R) Tensymeter (Continuous Noninvasive Blood Pressure Management Device) versus Conventional Invasive Radial Artery Monitoring in Surgical Patients
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2006; 102(2): 484 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
P.-S. Tsai, C. B. Yucha, W. W. Nichols, and H. Yarandi
Hemodynamics and Arterial Properties in Response to Mental Stress in Individuals with Mild Hypertension
Psychosom Med, July 1, 2003; 65(4): 613 - 619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. A. Awad, M. A. M. Ghobashy, R. G. Stout, D. G. Silverman, and K. H. Shelley
How Does the Plethysmogram Derived from the Pulse Oximeter Relate to Arterial Blood Pressure in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patients?
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2001; 93(6): 1466 - 1471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Mantha, M. F. Roizen, L. A. Fleisher, R. Thisted, and J. Foss
Comparing Methods of Clinical Measurement: Reporting Standards for Bland and Altman Analysis
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2000; 90(3): 593 - 602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.