Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Appadu, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lambert, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Appadu, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lambert, D. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 76, Issue 2 271-273, Copyright © 1996 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS

Interaction of i.v. anaesthetic agents with 5-HT3 receptors

B. L. Appadu and D. G. Lambert
University Department of Anaesthesia, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Close, Leicester LE1 5WW

Using N1E-115 neuroblastoma cells as an experimental model, we have examined if four commonly used i.v. anaesthetic induction agents interact with 5-HT3 receptors. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that the antiemetic effects of propofol may result from 5-HT3 receptor antagonism. Binding of tropisetron (a 5-HT3 selective reference compound), etomidate, ketamine, thiopentone and propofol to 5-HT3 receptors was assessed by measuring the displacement of [3H]BRL 43694 from whole N1E-115 cells. The rank order potency (Ki) was tropisetron (1.7 (SEM 0.2) nmol litre-1) >> etomidate (83.(4) mumol litre-1) > or = ketamine (97 (4) mumol litre-1) > thiopentone (177 (9) mumol litre-1) > propofol (819 (171) mumol litre-1). With the exception of thiopentone these effects were outside the clinical range and suggest that anaesthetic agents are unlikely to interact directly with 5-HT3 receptors, and that other mechanism(s) must underlie the antiemetic effects of propofol.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.