Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (54)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Russell, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kenny, G. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Russell, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kenny, G. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 75, Issue 5 562-566, Copyright © 1995 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Manual compared with target-controlled infusion of propofol

D. Russell, M. P. Wilkes, S. C. Hunter, J. B. Glen, P. Hutton and G. N. Kenny
University Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G31 2ER; University Department of Anaesthesia, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH; Clinical Research Group, Zeneca Pharamaceuticals, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK10 4TG; Glasgow University Department of Anaesthesia, HCI Hospital, Beardmore Street, Clydebank, Glasgow G81 4HX

We studied 160 ASA I-II patients, anaesthetized with propofol by infusion, using either a manually controlled or target-controlled infusion system. Patients were anaesthetized by eight consultant anaesthetists who had little or no previous experience of the use of propofol by infusion. In addition to propofol, patients received temazepam premedication, a single dose of fentanyl and 67% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Each consultant anaesthetized 10 patients in sequential fashion with each system. Use of the target-controlled infusion resulted in more rapid induction of anaesthesia and allowed earlier insertion of a laryngeal mask airway. There was a tendency towards less movement in response to the initial surgical stimulus and significantly less movement during the remainder of surgery. Significantly more propofol was administered during both induction and maintenance of anaesthesia with the target-controlled system. This was associated with significantly increased end-tidal carbon dioxide measurements during the middle period of maintenance only, but recovery from anaesthesia was not significantly prolonged in the target- controlled group. With the exception of a clinically insignificant difference in heart rate, haemodynamic variables were similar in the two groups. Six of the eight anaesthetists found the target-controlled system easier to use, and seven would use the target-controlled system in preference to a manually controlled infusion. Anaesthetists without prior experience of propofol infusion anaesthesia quickly became familiar with both manual and target-controlled techniques, and expressed a clear preference for the target-controlled system.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. R. Absalom, M. Lee, D. K. Menon, S. R. Sharar, T. De Smet, J. Halliday, M. Ogden, P. Corlett, G. D. Honey, and P. C. Fletcher
Predictive performance of the Domino, Hijazi, and Clements models during low-dose target-controlled ketamine infusions in healthy volunteers
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2007; 98(5): 615 - 623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
O. Grottke, P. J. Dietrich, S. Wiegels, and F. Wappler
Intraoperative Wake-Up Test and Postoperative Emergence in Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery: A Comparison of Intravenous and Inhaled Anesthetic Techniques Using Short-Acting Anesthetics
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2004; 99(5): 1521 - 1527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. Absalom, D. Amutike, A. Lal, M. White, and G. N. C. Kenny
Accuracy of the 'Paedfusor' in children undergoing cardiac surgery or catheterization
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2003; 91(4): 507 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Lehmann, J. Boldt, E. Thaler, S. Piper, and U. Weisse
Bispectral Index in Patients with Target-Controlled or Manually-Controlled Infusion of Propofol
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2002; 95(3): 639 - 644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Passot, F. Servin, R. Allary, J. Pascal, J.-M. Prades, C. Auboyer, and S. Molliex
Target-Controlled Versus Manually-Controlled Infusion of Propofol for Direct Laryngoscopy and Bronchoscopy
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2002; 94(5): 1212 - 1216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
K. R. Watson and M. V. Shah
Clinical comparison of 'single agent' anaesthesia with sevoflurane versus target controlled infusion of propofol
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2000; 85(4): 541 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. Han, D. Kim, H. Kil, and Y. Inagaki
The Effects of Plasma Fentanyl Concentrations on Propofol Requirement, Emergence from Anesthesia, and Postoperative Analgesia in Propofol-Nitrous Oxide Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2000; 90(6): 1365 - 1371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
A. J Fox and D. J Rowbotham
Recent advances: Anaesthesia
BMJ, August 28, 1999; 319(7209): 557 - 560.
[Full Text]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Suttner, J. Boldt, C. Schmidt, S. Piper, and B. Kumle
Cost Analysis of Target-Controlled Infusion-Based Anesthesia Compared with Standard Anesthesia Regimens
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 1999; 88(1): 77 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.