Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jakobsen, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Carlsson, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jakobsen, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Carlsson, P. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 75, Issue 5 536-540, Copyright © 1995 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Extradural anaesthesia for repeated surgical treatment in the presence of infection

K. B. Jakobsen, M. K. Christensen and P. S. Carlsson
Department of Anaesthesia, Aarhus University Hospital, Amtssygehuset, DK-8000 Arhus, Denmark

The use of extradural catheters in patients with systemic or localized infection is controversial. The catheter may act as a focus for secondary infection resulting in an extradural abscess. in this study we have examined the use of extradural catheters for anaesthesia over the past 7 yr in patients with localized infections. The records of 69 patients were reviewed and patients interviewed (letter/phone). These patients had a total of 120 extradural catheters placed and received, on average, four anaesthetics, with the extradural catheter remaining in place for a mean of 9 days. On 12 occasions (eight patients) the catheter was removed because of signs or symptoms of local infection. Specific antibiotic therapy was not initiated, but ongoing therapy was continued. A single case of spondylitis was the only serious complication found but was not related to the extradural technique. We conclude that extradural anaesthesia for patients who require repeated surgical treatments for abscesses or infected wound is a relatively safe procedure.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
R. G. Wheatley, S. A. Schug, and D. Watson
Safety and efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2001; 87(1): 47 - 61.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.