Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, I. E.
Right arrow Articles by Shneerson, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, I. E.
Right arrow Articles by Shneerson, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 75, Issue 4 399-404, Copyright © 1995 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

A progressive care programme for prolonged ventilatory failure: analysis of outcome

I. E. Smith and J. M. Shneerson
Respiratory Support and Sleep Centre, Papworth Hospital, Papworth Everard, Cambridge CB3 8RE

Forty consecutive patients who could not be weaned from mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) entered a multidisciplinary progressive care programme (PCP). The mean number of hours per day of ventilatory support was 19.9 at the time of transfer but only 6.7 at discharge. Eleven patients did not require ventilation after discharge, 24 received ventilation non-invasively and only three via a tracheostomy. Survival at discharge from hospital was 90% compared with the predicted survival of 53% from the Apache II scores on admission to the ICU. Seventy-six percent were alive 1 yr after discharge and 80% of patients were discharged directly from the PCP to their homes. Mental and emotional scores in a quality of life questionnaire (SF 36) were normal, but physical function remained limited.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
L. Nici, C. Donner, E. Wouters, R. Zuwallack, N. Ambrosino, J. Bourbeau, M. Carone, B. Celli, M. Engelen, B. Fahy, et al.
American thoracic society/european respiratory society statement on pulmonary rehabilitation.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2006; 173(12): 1390 - 1413.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
T. G. Quinnell, S. Pilsworth, J. M. Shneerson, and I. E. Smith
Prolonged Invasive Ventilation Following Acute Ventilatory Failure in COPD: Weaning Results, Survival, and the Role of Noninvasive Ventilation
Chest, January 1, 2006; 129(1): 133 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
A K Simonds
Streamlining weaning: protocols and weaning units
Thorax, March 1, 2005; 60(3): 175 - 182.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
D V Pilcher, M J Bailey, D F Treacher, S Hamid, A J Williams, and A C Davidson
Outcomes, cost and long term survival of patients referred to a regional weaning centre
Thorax, March 1, 2005; 60(3): 187 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chronic Respiratory DiseaseHome page
M Carone and C F Donner
Impact of long-term ventilation on patients-health status
Chronic Respiratory Disease, January 1, 2005; 2(1): 29 - 33.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.