Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loan, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gaston, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Loan, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gaston, J. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 75, Issue 3 289-292, Copyright © 1995 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Comparison of desflurane and isoflurane in anaesthesia for dental surgery

P. B. Loan, R. K. Mirakhur, L. D. Paxton and J. H. Gaston
Department of Anaesthetics, The Queen's University Belfast, Whitla Medical Building, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL; The Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast

We studied 50 ASA I-II patients, aged 18-65 yr, undergoing elective orofacial surgery. Anaesthesia was induced with fentanyl and propofol, and maintained with 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen and either desflurane or isoflurane to compare recovery characteristics and cardiovascular stability. Cardiovascular responses to induction, intubation and incision were similar with both agents, although the increase in heart rate in response to intubation was less marked in the desflurane group. Maximum end-tidal concentrations of desflurane required were 4.0-10.6% (mean 6.8%) compared with maximum isoflurane concentrations of 1.1-2.3% (mean 1.6%). Mean duration of anaesthesia was 46 (SD 17.9) min (range 25-89 min) in the desflurane group and 41 (11.5) (23-60) min in the isoflurane group. Times to extubation were 6.7 (2.1) (3-10) min and 11.3 (4.1) (5-23) min, to eye opening 6.8 (2.2) (3-11) min and 12.7 (6.9) (7-37) min, to stating date of birth 9.0 (2.3) (4-12) min and 15.0 (6.9) (8-39) and to discharge from the recovery room 45 (11.6) (22- 80) min and 64 (20.9) (28-134) min, for the desflurane and isoflurane groups, respectively (all P < 0.0001). No serious complications occurred in any patient.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.