Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirabayashi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Furuse, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hirabayashi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Furuse, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, Vol 75, Issue 1 6-8, Copyright © 1995 by The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

Anatomical configuration of the spinal column in the supine position. II. Comparison of pregnant and non-pregnant women

Y. Hirabayashi, R. Shimizu, H. Fukuda, K. Saitoh and M. Furuse
Department of Anaesthesiology, Jichi Medical School, Tochigi, 329-04 Japan; Department of Radiology, Jichi Medical School, Tochigi, 329-04 Japan

To assess the changes in the curvature of the spinal column in the supine position during pregnancy, we studied seven pregnant (32-37 weeks of pregnancy) and seven non-pregnant women using magnetic resonance imaging. T1-weighted sagittal midline magnetic resonance images of the spinal column were obtained with subjects in the supine position with left tilt. There was no significant difference in the maximum angle of decline of the lumbar spinal canal between the pregnant (mean 12.4 (SD 3.3) degrees) and non-pregnant (13.4 (3.9) degrees) groups. The maximum angle of incline of the upper thoracic spinal canal was smaller in the pregnant (15.8 (2.9) degrees) than in the non-pregnant (22.7 (6.0) degrees) group. The highest point of the lumbar spinal canal was located at a lower lumbar region in the pregnant (median L4-5 (range L4 to L4-5)) than in the non-pregnant (L4 (L3-4 to L4)) group. The lowest point of the thoracic spinal canal was located at a higher thoracic region in the pregnant (T6-7 (T6 to T7-8)) than in the non-pregnant (T8 (T6-7 to T9)) group. This study revealed that the apex of lumbar lordosis was caudad and thoracic kyphosis was reduced in the supine position in the later stages of pregnancy. These changes in the curvature of the spinal column may explain, in part, the enhanced cephalad spread of subarachnoid hyperbaric anaesthetic solutions in the later stages of pregnancy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. P. Hallworth, R. Fernando, M. O. Columb, and G. M. Stocks
The Effect of Posture and Baricity on the Spread of Intrathecal Bupivacaine for Elective Cesarean Delivery
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2005; 100(4): 1159 - 1165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
A. Fassoulaki, V. Gatzou, G. Petropoulos, and I. Siafaka
Spread of subarachnoid block, intraoperative local anaesthetic requirements and postoperative analgesic requirements in Caesarean section and total abdominal hysterectomy
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2004; 93(5): 678 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
N. Rawal
Analgesia for day-case surgery
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2001; 87(1): 73 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.