Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KLOTZ, K.-F.
Right arrow Articles by SCHMUCKER, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KLOTZ, K.-F.
Right arrow Articles by SCHMUCKER, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1995, Vol. 74, No. 6 655-660
© 1995 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

other

Continuous measurement of cardiac output during aortic cross-clamping by the oesophageal Doppler monitor ODM 1

K.-F. KLOTZ, MD, S. KLINGSIEK, M. SINGER, BPHARAM, MD, FRCA, H. WENK, BPHARAM, MD, FRCA, S. ELEFTHERIADIS, MD, H. KUPPE, MD and P. SCHMUCKER, MD

Department of Anaesthesiology, Medical University of Lübeck Ratzeburger Allce 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany
Department of Surgery, Medical University of Lübeck Ratzeburger Allce 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany
Bloomsbury Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, University College London, Medical School Rayne Institute Building, University Street, London WC1E 6JJ

We have compared the Doppler against the thermodilution technique for measurement of cardiac output in six patients during aortic surgery. The correlation coefficient between the two methods was between 0.76 and 0.84 during the different periods of the operation. Using the integral nomo-gram instead of direct calibration, the Doppler system underestimated cardiac output in atherosclerotic patients. However, the Doppler method did register accurately significant changes in cardiac output.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. Schober, S. A. Loer, and L. A. Schwarte
Perioperative Hemodynamic Monitoring with Transesophageal Doppler Technology
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2009; 109(2): 340 - 353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. P. Joshi
Less Is Not More: A Lack of Evidence for Intraoperative Fluid Restriction Improving Outcome After Major Elective Gastrointestinal Surgery
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2006; 102(3): 971 - 971.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
H. A. Leather and P. F. Wouters
Oesophageal Doppler monitoring overestimates cardiac output during lumbar epidural anaesthesia
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2001; 86(6): 794 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.