British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1995, Vol. 74, No. 3 315-318
© 1995 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
research-article |
Comparison of the effects of four i.v. anaesthetic agents on polymorphonuclear leucocyte function
University Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Infirmary Glasgow G31 2ER.
Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Infirmary Glasgow G31 2ER.
Department of Surgery, Western Infirmary Glasgow G11 6NT.
Department of Physiology, Louisiana State University New Orleans, LA 70112-1393, USA.
Department of Surgery, Algemene Heelkunde, Academisch Ziekenhuis 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
Correspondence to J. A. H. D.
Initial resistance to bacterial infection is mediated primarily by polymorphonuclear leucocytes (PMN). Anaesthetic agents have been reported to impair various aspects of PMN function. It is possible that the use of these agents to sedate critically ill patients may further compromise an already depressed host defence mechanism. A flow cytometric technique with fresh whole blood from 10 healthy volunteers was used. Phagocytic and respiratory burst activity of PMN incubated for 1 h with either propofol, thiopentone, midazolam or ketamine at both clinical plasma concentrations and 100 times this concentration were determined. Thiopentone at the higher concentration reduced both respiratory burst activity (mean peak channel 50.7 compared with control value of 77.6 (P < 0.0001)) and phagocytosis (mean peak channel 47.5 compared with 79.9 (P < 0.0001)). Ketamine at 100 times the clinical plasma concentration also reduced respiratory burst and phagocytosis, but this failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.10 and P = 0.053, respectively). No significant depression occurred in the other groups. The results suggest that these i.v. anaesthetic agents, at clinically relevant concentrations, have minimal effects on PMN phagocytosis and oxygen free radical production. At higher concentrations thiopentone and ketamine may affect phagocytic function and thiopentone may impair intracellular cytolysis. (Br. J. Anaesth. 1995; 74: 315318)
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Malagon, K. Hogenbirk, J. van Pelt, M. G. Hazekamp, and J. G. Bovill Effect of three different anaesthetic agents on the postoperative production of cardiac troponin T in paediatric cardiac surgery Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2005; 94(6): 805 - 809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-K. Song and D. C. Jeong The Effect of Propofol on Cytotoxicity and Apoptosis of Lipopolysaccharide-Treated Mononuclear Cells and Lymphocytes Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2004; 98(6): 1724 - 1728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nagata, M. Kansha, K. Irita, and S. Takahashi Propofol inhibits FMLP-stimulated phosphorylation of p42 mitogen-activated protein kinase and chemotaxis in human neutrophils Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2001; 86(6): 853 - 858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Szekely, B. Heindl, S. Zahler, P. F. Conzen, and B. F. Becker Nonuniform Behavior of Intravenous Anesthetics on Postischemic Adhesion of Neutrophils in the Guinea Pig Heart Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2000; 90(6): 1293 - 1300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

