Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (43)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MCCRAE, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by MCCLURE, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MCCRAE, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by MCCLURE, J. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1995, Vol. 74, No. 3 261-265
© 1995 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


research-article

Comparison of ropivacaine and bupivacaine in extradural analgesia for the relief of pain in labour

A. F. MCCRAE, DRCOG, FFARCSI, H. JOZWIAK, BA and J. H. MCCLURE, BSC(HONS), FRCA

Department of Anaesthetics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh Lauriston Place, Edinburgh
Clinical Research and Development Astra Pain Control AB, S-151 85 Sodertalje, Sweden

Forty women having requested extradural analgesia for labour were allocated randomly to receive 0.5% ropivacaine or bupivacaine 10 ml as the main dose. When a top-up was requested, 0.25% ropivacaine or bupivacaine 10 ml was given (the same drug as the main dose). The study ended when a second top-up was requested or delivery of the baby occurred. Pain from two contractions was assessed before extradural block by visual analogue scoring and thereafter with every contraction. Sensory block and motor block were assessed at intervals. The only significant difference between the groups was a shorter onset of pain relief after the main dose of bupivacaine; there were no other significant differences in duration, onset of pain relief after top-up, quality of analgesia, spread of sensory block and motor block between the groups. Cardiovascular changes and neonatal outcome were similar in the two groups (Br. J. Anaesth. 1995; 74: 261–265)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J.-W. Yi, B.-J. Lee, D.-O. Kim, S.-W. Park, Y.-K. Choi, H.-K. Chang, C.-J. Kim, and J.-H. Park
Effects of bupivacaine and ropivacaine on field potential in rat hippocampal slices
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2009; 102(5): 673 - 679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. B. Lee, W. D. Ngan Kee, F. F. Ng, T. K. Lau, and E. L. Y. Wong
Epidural Infusions of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine for Labor Analgesia: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Obstetric Outcome
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2004; 98(4): 1145 - 1152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. H. Halpern and V. Walsh
Epidural Ropivacaine Versus Bupivacaine for Labor: A Meta-Analysis
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2003; 96(5): 1473 - 1479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
H. J. Clement, L. Caruso, F. Lopez, F. Broisin, M. Blanc-Jouvan, E. Derre-Brunet, A. Thomasson, G. Leboucher, and J. P. Viale
Epidural analgesia with 0.15% ropivacaine plus sufentanil 0.5 {micro}g ml-1versus 0.10% bupivacaine plus sufentanil 0.5 {micro}g ml-1: a double-blind comparison during labour
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2002; 88(6): 809 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. D. Owen, J. A. Thomas, T. Smith, L. C. Harris, and R. D'Angelo
Ropivacaine 0.075% and Bupivacaine 0.075% with Fentanyl 2 {micro}g/mL are Equivalent for Labor Epidural Analgesia
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2002; 94(1): 179 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J. B. Whiteside and J. A. W. Wildsmith
Developments in local anaesthetic drugs
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2001; 87(1): 27 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. Fernandez-Guisasola, M. L. Serrano, B. Cobo, L. Munoz, A. Plaza, C. Trigo, and S. Garcia del Valle
A Comparison of 0.0625% Bupivacaine with Fentanyl and 0.1% Ropivacaine with Fentanyl for Continuous Epidural Labor Analgesia
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2001; 92(5): 1261 - 1265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. Debon, B. Allaouchiche, F. Duflo, E. Boselli, and D. Chassard
The Analgesic Effect of Sufentanil Combined with Ropivacaine 0.2% for Labor Analgesia: A Comparison of Three Sufentanil Doses
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2001; 92(1): 180 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. C. Meister, R. D’Angelo, M. Owen, K. E. Nelson, and R. Gaver
A Comparison of Epidural Analgesia with 0.125% Ropivacaine with Fentanyl Versus 0.125% Bupivacaine with Fentanyl during Labor
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2000; 90(3): 632 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
Y. Beilin, M. Galea, J. Zahn, and C. A. Bodian
Epidural Ropivacaine for the Initiation of Labor Epidural Analgesia: A Dose Finding Study
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 1999; 88(6): 1340 - 1340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.