British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1995, Vol. 74, No. 3 261-265
© 1995 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia
research-article |
Comparison of ropivacaine and bupivacaine in extradural analgesia for the relief of pain in labour
Department of Anaesthetics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh Lauriston Place, Edinburgh
Clinical Research and Development Astra Pain Control AB, S-151 85 Sodertalje, Sweden
Forty women having requested extradural analgesia for labour were allocated randomly to receive 0.5% ropivacaine or bupivacaine 10 ml as the main dose. When a top-up was requested, 0.25% ropivacaine or bupivacaine 10 ml was given (the same drug as the main dose). The study ended when a second top-up was requested or delivery of the baby occurred. Pain from two contractions was assessed before extradural block by visual analogue scoring and thereafter with every contraction. Sensory block and motor block were assessed at intervals. The only significant difference between the groups was a shorter onset of pain relief after the main dose of bupivacaine; there were no other significant differences in duration, onset of pain relief after top-up, quality of analgesia, spread of sensory block and motor block between the groups. Cardiovascular changes and neonatal outcome were similar in the two groups (Br. J. Anaesth. 1995; 74: 261265)
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-W. Yi, B.-J. Lee, D.-O. Kim, S.-W. Park, Y.-K. Choi, H.-K. Chang, C.-J. Kim, and J.-H. Park Effects of bupivacaine and ropivacaine on field potential in rat hippocampal slices Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2009; 102(5): 673 - 679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. B. Lee, W. D. Ngan Kee, F. F. Ng, T. K. Lau, and E. L. Y. Wong Epidural Infusions of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine for Labor Analgesia: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Obstetric Outcome Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2004; 98(4): 1145 - 1152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Halpern and V. Walsh Epidural Ropivacaine Versus Bupivacaine for Labor: A Meta-Analysis Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2003; 96(5): 1473 - 1479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Clement, L. Caruso, F. Lopez, F. Broisin, M. Blanc-Jouvan, E. Derre-Brunet, A. Thomasson, G. Leboucher, and J. P. Viale Epidural analgesia with 0.15% ropivacaine plus sufentanil 0.5 {micro}g ml-1versus 0.10% bupivacaine plus sufentanil 0.5 {micro}g ml-1: a double-blind comparison during labour Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2002; 88(6): 809 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Owen, J. A. Thomas, T. Smith, L. C. Harris, and R. D'Angelo Ropivacaine 0.075% and Bupivacaine 0.075% with Fentanyl 2 {micro}g/mL are Equivalent for Labor Epidural Analgesia Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2002; 94(1): 179 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Whiteside and J. A. W. Wildsmith Developments in local anaesthetic drugs Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2001; 87(1): 27 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Fernandez-Guisasola, M. L. Serrano, B. Cobo, L. Munoz, A. Plaza, C. Trigo, and S. Garcia del Valle A Comparison of 0.0625% Bupivacaine with Fentanyl and 0.1% Ropivacaine with Fentanyl for Continuous Epidural Labor Analgesia Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2001; 92(5): 1261 - 1265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Debon, B. Allaouchiche, F. Duflo, E. Boselli, and D. Chassard The Analgesic Effect of Sufentanil Combined with Ropivacaine 0.2% for Labor Analgesia: A Comparison of Three Sufentanil Doses Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2001; 92(1): 180 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. C. Meister, R. D’Angelo, M. Owen, K. E. Nelson, and R. Gaver A Comparison of Epidural Analgesia with 0.125% Ropivacaine with Fentanyl Versus 0.125% Bupivacaine with Fentanyl during Labor Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2000; 90(3): 632 - 637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Beilin, M. Galea, J. Zahn, and C. A. Bodian Epidural Ropivacaine for the Initiation of Labor Epidural Analgesia: A Dose Finding Study Anesth. Analg., June 1, 1999; 88(6): 1340 - 1340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

