Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TÖRN, K.
Right arrow Articles by LINDGREN, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by TÖRN, K.
Right arrow Articles by LINDGREN, L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1994, Vol. 73, No. 3 411-412
© 1994 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

research-article

Effects of sub-hypnotic doses of propofol on the side effects of intrathecal morphine

K. TÖRN, MD, M. TUOMINEN, MD, PHD, P. TARKKILA, MD, PHD and L. LINDGREN, MD, PHD

Department of Anaesthesia, 4th Department of Surgery Kasarmikatu 11–13, 00130 Helsinki, Finland

Correspondence to M. T.

We have studied the effect of propofol on the side effects associated with intrathecal morphine in 40 patients undergoing major arthroplasty. Patients received spinal anaesthesia with plain 0.5% bupivacaine 20 mg mixed with preservative-free morphine 0.3 mg. Before injection of the local anaesthetic, the patients were allocated randomly to receive either a bolus dose of propofol 10mg followed by an infusion of 30 mg/24 h or equal volumes of 10% Intralipid (control group). The number of patients without postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was similar in both groups. However, the incidence of nausea and vomiting was lower in the propofol (13 and 22, respectively) than in the control (34 and 36) group (P ≤ 0.01 and P ≤ 0.05, respectively). Severe vomiting episodes were less frequent in the propofol group (1 vs 11; P ≤ 0.05). Four patients in the propofol group and 12 patients in the control group had itching (P ≤ 0.05). The incidence of urinary retention was similar in both groups. There was no additional sedation attributable to propofol. In conclusion, sub-hypnotic doses of propofol protected significantly against itching and had a modest effect on PONV after intrathecal morphine.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
D. Tamdee, S. Charuluxananan, Y. Punjasawadwong, C. Tawichasri, J. Patumanond, and P. Sriprajittichai
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Pentazocine Versus Ondansetron for the Treatment of Intrathecal Morphine-Induced Pruritus in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2009; 109(5): 1606 - 1611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
M.-P. Bonnet, E. Marret, J. Josserand, and F. J. Mercier
Effect of prophylactic 5-HT3 receptor antagonists on pruritus induced by neuraxial opioids: a quantitative systematic review
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2008; 101(3): 311 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. P. Rathmell, T. R. Lair, and B. Nauman
The Role of Intrathecal Drugs in the Treatment of Acute Pain
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5S_Suppl): S30 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. L. Parlow, I. Costache, N. Avery, and K. Turner
Single-Dose Haloperidol for the Prophylaxis of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Intrathecal Morphine
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2004; 98(4): 1072 - 1076.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.