Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SHAH, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SHAH, J. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1994, Vol. 73, No. 3 309-314
© 1994 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


research-article

Positive lumbar extradural space pressure

J. L. SHAH, MB, CHB, FRCA

Department of Anaesthesia, Dudley Road Hospital Birmingham B18 7QH

Specially selected soft Macintosh balloon indicators were attached to needles during five extradural and five spinal punctures. When the needle point entered the extradural space, the mean balloon pressure decreased suddenly from 24.9 (range 14–37) to 12.3 (10–16) mm Hg in the five extradural punctures and from 22.3 (17–28) to 13.7 (10–17) mm Hg in the five spinal punctures. In the five spinal punctures, the balloon pressure did not alter when the needle was advanced from the extradural to the subarachnoid space. Contrary to expectation, none of the balloons deflated when the needle point entered the extradural or subarachnoid spaces. The balloon pressure varied rhythmically in synchrony with respiration and cardiac pulsations. The final balloon pressure, extradural space pressure and subarachnoid pressure were equal. The results suggest that the extradural pressure is positive and of the same magnitude as the prevailing lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Jugular venous compression, ventilation with carbon dioxide and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) produce a rapid increase in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure. These stimuli also produced a measurable increase in the lumbar extradural pressure. Jugular venous compression increased the mean lumbar extradural pressure by 6.8 (3–10) mm Hg and ventilation with carbon dioxide increased it by 10 (5–12.5) mm Hg. PEEP values of 5, 10, 15 and 20 cm H2O produced an immediate increase in extradural pressure of 1–2 mm Hg for every 5 cm H2O of PEEP. The lumbar extradural pressure increased rapidly with stimuli known to increase CSF pressure. Changes in spinal CSF pressure may be detected by measuring extradural pressure.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.