Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BOEKE, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by LANGEMEIJER, J. J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BOEKE, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by LANGEMEIJER, J. J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1994, Vol. 72, No. 6 654-656
© 1994 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


research-article

Effect of antagonizing residual neuromuscular block by neostigmine and atropine on postoperative vomiting

A. J. BOEKE, M.D., J. J. DE LANGE, M.D., B. VAN DRUENEN and J. J. M. LANGEMEIJER, M.D., PH.D.

Department of Anaesthesiology, De Wever Hospital Postbox 4446, 6401 CX Heerlen, The Netherlands
Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Vrije Universiteit Postbox 7057, 1007 MD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Department of Anaesthesiology, St Antonius Ziefcenhuis Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands

Eighty patients undergoing outpatient surgery under general anaesthesia were allocated randomly to two groups: in group A residual neuromuscular block was antagonized with a mixture of neostigmine 1.5 mg and atropine 0.5 mg; in group B spontaneous recovery was allowed. The patients were assessed after operation in hospital and 24 h after discharge. We found a significant difference (P<0.05) in requirements for antiemetic therapy with a smaller need in the group which received neostigmine (in group A four of 40 patients received an antiemetic compared with 12 in group B). There was no significant difference in frequency of nausea or vomiting between the two groups. The incidence of postoperative nausea was 14 in group A and 18 in group B and the number of patients with postoperative vomiting was 10 in group A and 15 in group B.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
K. M. Tran, T. J. Ganley, L. Wells, A. Ganesh, K. I. Minger, and G. Cucchiaro
Intraarticular Bupivacaine-Clonidine-Morphine Versus Femoral-Sciatic Nerve Block in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5): 1304 - 1310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C.-R. Cheng, D. I. Sessler, and C. C. Apfel
Does Neostigmine Administration Produce a Clinically Important Increase in Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting?
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5): 1349 - 1355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. P. Joshi, S. A. Garg, A. Hailey, and S. Y. Yu
The Effects of Antagonizing Residual Neuromuscular Blockade by Neostigmine and Glycopyrrolate on Nausea and Vomiting After Ambulatory Surgery
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 1999; 89(3): 628 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.