Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LEE, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by SWANSON, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LEE, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by SWANSON, P. W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1992, Vol. 69, No. 5 522-525
© 1992 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia

other

BACTERIAL RETENTION PROPERTIES OF HEAT AND MOISTURE EXCHANGE FILTERS

M. G. LEE, B.PHARM, PH.D., M.R.PHARM.S., M.R.S.C, C.CHEM.1,*, J. L. FORD, B.SC., PH.D., M.R.PHARM.S.2, P. B. HUNT, B.SC., C.BIOL., M.I.BIOL.3, D. S. IRELAND, B.SC., PH.D.4 and P. W. SWANSON, B.SC, C.HNG., M.R.A.E.S., P.G.C.E.4

1Mersey Regional Health Authority Hamilton House, 24 Pall Mall, Liverpool L3 6AL
2School of Pharmacy, The Liverpool John Moores University Byrom Street, Liverpool L3 3AF
3Pharmaceutical Microbiology Laboratory, Whiston Hospital Prescot, Merscyside L35 5DR
4QC Laboratory, Countess of Chester Hospital Liverpool Road, Chester CHI 2BA

*Correspondence to M.G.L.

We have examined the properties of six heat and moisture exchange filters (HMEF) to ascertain their resistance to liquid flow and their ability to retain a challenge bacterium, Pseudomonas diminuta, from aqueous and nebulized suspensions. Only one HMEF, the Pall Ultipor was able to withstand a significantly greater pressure of liquid than that found in clinical practice. However, when breached, the HMEF were unable to prevent transmission of micro-organisms from aqueous suspension. Only the Darex Hydrobac filter failed to meet the manufacturer's claim for filter efficiency for nebulized bacteria, mainly because the filter housing failed under test. When the reduction in bacterial cells after passage of the nebulized Pseudomonas diminuta through the HMEFs was analysed statistically, the data showed that the HMEF produced by Pall (Ultipor) and Intersurgical (Filter therm) were superior to those produced by DAP, Mediplan (Hygrobac), Intertech (HME 225–2835–800) and Gibeck (Humid-vent). (Br. J. Anaesth. 1992;69:522–525)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
J. Dellamonica, N. Boisseau, B. Goubaux, and M. Raucoules-Aime
Comparison of manufacturers' specifications for 44 types of heat and moisture exchanging filters
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2004; 93(4): 532 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
R. R. Demers
Bacterial/Viral Filtration : Let the Breather Beware!
Chest, October 1, 2001; 120(4): 1377 - 1389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.