Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (46)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RICE, A. S. C.
Right arrow Articles by McMAHON, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by RICE, A. S. C.
Right arrow Articles by McMAHON, S. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1992, Vol. 69, No. 5 433-438
© 1992 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


research-article

PERIPHERAL NERVE INJURY CAUSED BY INJECTION NEEDLES USED IN REGIONAL ANAESTHESIA: INFLUENCE OF BEVEL CONFIGURATION, STUDIED IN A RAT MODEL

A. S. C. RICE, M.D., F.R.C.ANAES.* and S. B. McMAHON, PH.D.

Department of Physiology, United Medical and Dental Schools, St Thomas' Hospital Campus Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH

We have studied the immediate and long term (up to 28 days) effects of short and long bevelled needle impalement of the rat sciatic nerve. Three techniques were used to assess neural trauma and its consequences: stained longitudinal nerve sections were assessed by light microscopy and scored for injury; the extravasation of Evan's Blue dye, after antidromic electrical nerve stimulation, was used as a test of unmye/inated fibre function; the flexion withdrawal times from a noxious stimulus were measured. The results of all three experiments suggested that, should a nerve fascicle become accidentally impaled during regional anaesthesia, the lesions induced by short bevelled needles are more severe, more frequent and take longer to repair than those induced by long bevelled needles. Nerve injury induced by short bevelled needles was associated with persisting signs of injury 28 days after the injury. These results suggest that the current practice of using short bevelled needles to prevent nerve injury complicating regional anaesthesia be reassessed. (Br. J. Anaesth. 1992; 69: 433–438).

* Present address: Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. A. Liguori, V. M. Zayas, J. T. YaDeau, R. L. Kahn, L. Paroli, V. Buschiazzo, and A. Wu
Nerve localization techniques for interscalene brachial plexus blockade: a prospective, randomized comparison of mechanical paresthesia versus electrical stimulation.
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2006; 103(3): 761 - 767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
G. Iohom, G. B. Lan, D. P. Diarra, Y. Grignon, B. P. Kinirons, F. Girard, M. Merle, G. Granier, V. Cahn, and H. Bouaziz
Long-term evaluation of motor function following intraneural injection of ropivacaine using walking track analysis in rats
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2005; 94(4): 524 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
P. D. W. Fettes and J. A. W. Wildsmith
Editorial III: Somebody else's nervous system
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2002; 88(6): 760 - 763.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. T. Horlocker, R. P. Kufner, A. T. Bishop, P. M. Maxson, and D. R. Schroeder
The Risk of Persistent Paresthesia Is Not Increased with Repeated Axillary Block
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 1999; 88(2): 382 - 382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.