Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-Letters: Submit a response to the article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PUTTICK, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by GLEN, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PUTTICK, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by GLEN, J. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 1992, Vol. 69, No. 4 375-381
© 1992 The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia


research-article

EFFECT OF GRADED INFUSION RATES OF PROPOFOL ON REGIONAL AND GLOBAL LEFT VENTRICULAR FUNCTION IN THE DOG{dagger}

R. M. PUTTICK, M.SC., D.PHIL,, J. DIEDERICKS, B.M., B.A., M.MED. (ANAES.), F.F.A.(S.A.)*, J. W. SEAR, M.A., B.SC., M.B., B.S., PH.D., F.R.C.ANAES., P. FOËX, M.A., D.PHIL., D.M. (GENEVA), F.R.C.ANAES., W. A. RYDER and J. B. GLEN, B.V.M.S., PH;D,D.V.A.

Department of Pharmacology, University of Oxford Oxford
Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Radcliffe Infirmary Oxford OX2 6HE.
Medical Research Department, ICI Pharmaceuticals Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire.

Correspondence to P.F.

We have studied the effects of graded infusion rates of propofol (0.2–0.5 mg kg–1 min–1) on left ventricular global and regional function, in eight acutely instrumented dogs. Global function was assessed by measurement of aortic and left ventricular pressure, L V dP/dtmax, aortic blood acceleration and stroke volume. Regional function was assessed by measurement of systolic shortening and the endsystolic pressure-length relationship. The response of the coronary circulation to short periods of occlusion was also assessed. Administration of propofol significantly reduced left ventricular preload, as indicated by reductions in end-diastolic pressure and length; contractility was depressed, the depression being greater in the apex than in the base of the left ventricle. High infusion rates impaired relaxation. Regulation of coronary blood flow was not disrupted. Reductions in preload and contractility contributed to the propofol-induced hypotension. After 60 min, recovery from the greatest infusion rate was incomplete.

*Present address: Department of Anaesthesiology, University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, SA.

{dagger}Abstract presented at the 11th Annual Meeting of the European Academy of Anaesthesiology, Bonn, Germany, September 1989.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
D. Takizawa, K. Nishikawa, E. Sato, H. Hiraoka, K. Yamamoto, S. Saito, R. Horiuchi, and F. Goto
A dopamine infusion decreases propofol concentration during epidural blockade under general anesthesia: [Une perfusion de dopamine diminue la concentration de propofol pendant le bloc peridural sous anesthesie generale]
Can J Anesth, May 1, 2005; 52(5): 463 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
D. Zheng, R. N. Upton, and A. M. Martinez
The Contribution of the Coronary Concentrations of Propofol to Its Cardiovascular Effects in Anesthetized Sheep
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2003; 96(6): 1589 - 1597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
W. Zhou, H. J. Fontenot, S.-N. Wang, and R. H. Kennedy
Propofol-Induced Alterations in Myocardial {beta}-Adrenoceptor Binding and Responsiveness
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 1999; 89(3): 604 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.